Tools & Wizards About Us
stardesigner.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 63

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

stardesigner.in

Freelance web designer in Hyderabad, Freelance Website Designer Hyderabad | Star Designer

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

136 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

745 ms

stardesigner.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to stardesigner.in homepage info - get ready to check Star Designer best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about stardesigner.in

I am a freelance Graphic and website Designer, having 5+ years of real-time experience. I am providing the best digital services like website design, freelance logo design, banners, Boucher design and...

Visit stardesigner.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Stardesigner.in page load time and found that the first response time was 136 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stardesigner.in performance score

63

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

74/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

73/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.185

66/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stardesigner.in

136 ms

bootstrap.min.css

130 ms

animate.min.css

124 ms

fontawesome.min.css

128 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

120 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Stardesigner.in, 10% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (622 ms) belongs to the original domain Stardesigner.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 432.1 kB (13%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stardesigner.in main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 25.4 kB

  • Original 31.1 kB
  • After minification 26.9 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.2 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 318.9 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 2.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Star Designer images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 85.3 kB

  • Original 186.7 kB
  • After minification 186.7 kB
  • After compression 101.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 85.3 kB or 46% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 63.8 kB
  • After minification 63.8 kB
  • After compression 61.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stardesigner.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (41%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

35

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Star Designer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

stardesigner.in

stardesigner.in

136 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

130 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

124 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

128 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

magnific-popup.min.css

120 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

122 ms

nice-select.css

nice-select.css

125 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

184 ms

meanmenu.css

meanmenu.css

185 ms

style.css

style.css

247 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

187 ms

js

js

60 ms

js

js

103 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

253 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

188 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

365 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

251 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

251 ms

jquery.nice-select.min.js

jquery.nice-select.min.js

253 ms

jquery.meanmenu.js

jquery.meanmenu.js

365 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

365 ms

form-validator.min.js

form-validator.min.js

364 ms

contact-form-script.js

contact-form-script.js

365 ms

main.js

main.js

365 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

23 ms

css

css

33 ms

css

css

50 ms

white-logo.png

white-logo.png

121 ms

black-logo.png

black-logo.png

120 ms

main-banner.jpg

main-banner.jpg

298 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

182 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

182 ms

1.png

1.png

127 ms

2.svg

2.svg

129 ms

3.png

3.png

128 ms

4.svg

4.svg

207 ms

5.svg

5.svg

201 ms

6.png

6.png

207 ms

dot1.png

dot1.png

240 ms

dot3.png

dot3.png

247 ms

dot4.png

dot4.png

248 ms

dot5.png

dot5.png

249 ms

dot6.png

dot6.png

250 ms

woman.jpg

woman.jpg

360 ms

1.png

1.png

302 ms

2.png

2.png

308 ms

3.png

3.png

309 ms

4.png

4.png

307 ms

5.png

5.png

359 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

537 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

622 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

487 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

544 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

424 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

425 ms

2.png

2.png

489 ms

woman2.jpg

woman2.jpg

495 ms

circle-map.png

circle-map.png

501 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ6bQl2xMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ6bQl2xMB.ttf

78 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ0LQl2xMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ0LQl2xMB.ttf

97 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ql2xMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ql2xMB.ttf

119 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJBbMl2xMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJBbMl2xMB.ttf

118 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJN7Ml2xMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJN7Ml2xMB.ttf

127 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJabMl2xMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJabMl2xMB.ttf

127 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ml2xMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ml2xMB.ttf

127 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

500 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

511 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

549 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

569 ms

1.png

1.png

506 ms

Accessibility Review

stardesigner.in accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

stardesigner.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

stardesigner.in SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stardesigner.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stardesigner.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stardesigner.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Star Designer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: