Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

starkandhammack.net

Attorney in Medford, OR | Stark and Hammack, PC

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

111 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

307 ms

starkandhammack.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to starkandhammack.net homepage info - get ready to check Stark And Hammack best content right away, or after learning these important things about starkandhammack.net

Trust locally-based attorneys at Stark and Hammack, PC in Medford, OR. We are dedicated to serving & fighting for you. Contact us to schedule a consultation.

Visit starkandhammack.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Starkandhammack.net page load time and found that the first response time was 111 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

starkandhammack.net performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value520 ms

56/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.445

20/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

starkandhammack.net

111 ms

4c6fddd0-ebd6-4270-aa57-780a58b09ca9.css

217 ms

55a9cc6a-6ba3-4002-b9c5-cea871e3670f.css

119 ms

js

109 ms

all.js

260 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Starkandhammack.net, 51% (41 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Siteminds.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (899 ms) relates to the external source Birdeye.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 305.4 kB (28%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

774.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Starkandhammack.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 588.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 192.9 kB

  • Original 228.8 kB
  • After minification 225.0 kB
  • After compression 35.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 192.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 238.8 kB
  • After minification 236.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stark And Hammack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 102.1 kB

  • Original 588.1 kB
  • After minification 575.8 kB
  • After compression 486.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 102.1 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

  • Original 23.8 kB
  • After minification 22.5 kB
  • After compression 15.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Starkandhammack.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.1 kB or 34% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (61%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

15

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stark And Hammack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

starkandhammack.net accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

starkandhammack.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

starkandhammack.net SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Starkandhammack.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Starkandhammack.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stark And Hammack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: