Tools & Wizards About Us
starmark.biz screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

starmark.biz

Starmark Investment | FCA Regulatory Umbrella | Appointed Representative | London, UK

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

127 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

65 ms

starmark.biz screenshot

About Website

Visit starmark.biz now to see the best up-to-date Starmark content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about starmark.biz

Starmark Investment Management Ltd. - London based cost competitive boutique working with professional marketers/traders providing Appointed Representative & FCA umbrella services.

Visit starmark.biz

Key Findings

We analyzed Starmark.biz page load time and found that the first response time was 127 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

starmark.biz performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value860 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.starmark.biz

127 ms

minified.js

33 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

30 ms

polyfill.min.js

65 ms

thunderbolt-commons.fe884ace.bundle.min.js

102 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Starmark.biz, 67% (12 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (327 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 311.3 kB (37%)

Content Size

834.4 kB

After Optimization

523.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Starmark.biz main page is 834.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 344.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 256.8 kB

  • Original 344.9 kB
  • After minification 343.1 kB
  • After compression 88.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 256.8 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 780 B

  • Original 179.5 kB
  • After minification 178.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Starmark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 53.8 kB

  • Original 310.0 kB
  • After minification 310.0 kB
  • After compression 256.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 53.8 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (59%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Starmark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.starmark.biz

www.starmark.biz

127 ms

minified.js

minified.js

33 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

30 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

65 ms

thunderbolt-commons.fe884ace.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.fe884ace.bundle.min.js

102 ms

main.cc1c9ca9.bundle.min.js

main.cc1c9ca9.bundle.min.js

99 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

97 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

98 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

94 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

99 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

98 ms

cc26d0_f1835588117e455282f6ffd4a5807c70~mv2_d_4604_2487_s_4_2.png

cc26d0_f1835588117e455282f6ffd4a5807c70~mv2_d_4604_2487_s_4_2.png

327 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

60 ms

City%20of%20London%20financial%20district%2C%20Building%2C%20people%20and%20FCA%20regulated%20activities_.jpg

City%20of%20London%20financial%20district%2C%20Building%2C%20people%20and%20FCA%20regulated%20activities_.jpg

222 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

6 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

13 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

7 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

6 ms

Accessibility Review

starmark.biz accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

starmark.biz best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

starmark.biz SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Starmark.biz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Starmark.biz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

starmark.biz

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Starmark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: