Tools & Wizards About Us
starnetting.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

starnetting.com

Star Birds Netting & Pest Control Sarita Vihar, New Delhi India

Page Load Speed

9.3 sec in total

First Response

521 ms

Resources Loaded

7.9 sec

Page Rendered

904 ms

starnetting.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Star Netting content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about starnetting.com

Our company, Star Birds Netting & Pest Control, has been providing solutions for pest control, for controlling Birds, Termite, Cockroach, Rodents, etc. We work as a Services, wholesaler and Manufactur...

Visit starnetting.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Starnetting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 521 ms and then it took 8.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

starnetting.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.4 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.12

84/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.6 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

starnetting.com

521 ms

www.starnetting.com

1015 ms

js

77 ms

bootstrap.min.css

238 ms

font-awesome.min.css

471 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Starnetting.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Starnetting.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 385.4 kB (11%)

Content Size

3.5 MB

After Optimization

3.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Starnetting.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 23.1 kB

  • Original 28.5 kB
  • After minification 21.7 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.9 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 360.1 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 3.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Star Netting needs image optimization as it can save up to 360.1 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 564 B

  • Original 58.8 kB
  • After minification 58.8 kB
  • After compression 58.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 47.8 kB
  • After minification 47.8 kB
  • After compression 46.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Starnetting.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (36%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Star Netting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

starnetting.com

starnetting.com

521 ms

www.starnetting.com

www.starnetting.com

1015 ms

js

js

77 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

238 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

471 ms

style.css

style.css

473 ms

demo.css

demo.css

474 ms

simplelightbox.min.css

simplelightbox.min.css

474 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

478 ms

style2.css

style2.css

482 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

39 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

703 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

706 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

708 ms

simple-lightbox.min.js

simple-lightbox.min.js

708 ms

gallery.js

gallery.js

715 ms

wowslider.js

wowslider.js

712 ms

script.js

script.js

936 ms

1.png

1.png

943 ms

2.png

2.png

945 ms

3.png

3.png

950 ms

4.png

4.png

951 ms

logo.png

logo.png

959 ms

slider2.jpeg

slider2.jpeg

1169 ms

slider3.jpeg

slider3.jpeg

1183 ms

slider4.jpeg

slider4.jpeg

1185 ms

slider1.jpeg

slider1.jpeg

1187 ms

a1.jpeg

a1.jpeg

1186 ms

a2.jpeg

a2.jpeg

1214 ms

ser-1.jpeg

ser-1.jpeg

1403 ms

ser-2.jpeg

ser-2.jpeg

1465 ms

ser-3.jpeg

ser-3.jpeg

1464 ms

ser-4.jpeg

ser-4.jpeg

1482 ms

ser-5.jpeg

ser-5.jpeg

1484 ms

ser-6.jpeg

ser-6.jpeg

1488 ms

other1.jpeg

other1.jpeg

1638 ms

other2.jpeg

other2.jpeg

1650 ms

other3.jpeg

other3.jpeg

1652 ms

other4.jpeg

other4.jpeg

1649 ms

whatsapp.png

whatsapp.png

720 ms

product-back.jpeg

product-back.jpeg

1497 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

11 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

484 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

476 ms

style.css

style.css

480 ms

demo.css

demo.css

478 ms

simplelightbox.min.css

simplelightbox.min.css

484 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

484 ms

style2.css

style2.css

485 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

484 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

487 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

486 ms

simple-lightbox.min.js

simple-lightbox.min.js

506 ms

wowslider.js

wowslider.js

503 ms

gallery.js

gallery.js

501 ms

conn.jpeg

conn.jpeg

952 ms

script.js

script.js

481 ms

1.png

1.png

723 ms

2.png

2.png

544 ms

css

css

29 ms

css

css

32 ms

3.png

3.png

540 ms

4.png

4.png

537 ms

logo.png

logo.png

3094 ms

css

css

19 ms

bg3.jpg

bg3.jpg

667 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff

22 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff

29 ms

font

font

35 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff

42 ms

font

font

41 ms

slider2.jpeg

slider2.jpeg

1202 ms

slider3.jpeg

slider3.jpeg

1192 ms

slider4.jpeg

slider4.jpeg

963 ms

a1.jpeg

a1.jpeg

1410 ms

slider1.jpeg

slider1.jpeg

952 ms

a2.jpeg

a2.jpeg

3766 ms

ser-1.jpeg

ser-1.jpeg

2177 ms

ser-3.jpeg

ser-3.jpeg

3494 ms

ser-2.jpeg

ser-2.jpeg

3984 ms

9YNLL0bmRhcAAfTIrgAAAA=

9YNLL0bmRhcAAfTIrgAAAA=

23 ms

ws-ctrl-material.svg

ws-ctrl-material.svg

1367 ms

ser-4.jpeg

ser-4.jpeg

2060 ms

ser-5.jpeg

ser-5.jpeg

2533 ms

ser-6.jpeg

ser-6.jpeg

2332 ms

other1.jpeg

other1.jpeg

2660 ms

other4.jpeg

other4.jpeg

2839 ms

other2.jpeg

other2.jpeg

4060 ms

other3.jpeg

other3.jpeg

3362 ms

product-back.jpeg

product-back.jpeg

3307 ms

conn.jpeg

conn.jpeg

4698 ms

Accessibility Review

starnetting.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

starnetting.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

starnetting.com SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Starnetting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Starnetting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

starnetting.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Star Netting. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: