Tools & Wizards About Us
starport.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

starport.com

Innovation Platform For Blockchain Development | Ignite CLI

Page Load Speed

162.4 sec in total

First Response

71 ms

Resources Loaded

161.7 sec

Page Rendered

563 ms

starport.com screenshot

About Website

Visit starport.com now to see the best up-to-date Starport content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about starport.com

Ignite CLI is a feature-packed tool designed to make blockchain development more accessible, approachable, and interoperable.

Visit starport.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Starport.com page load time and found that the first response time was 71 ms and then it took 162.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 37 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

starport.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

91/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value860 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

71 ms

ignite.com

59 ms

container_py6JfPnv.js

63 ms

container_3tAZ59fg.js

160996 ms

state.js

13 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Starport.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.matomo.cloud and 2% (1 request) were made to Aibignite.matomo.cloud. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (161 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.matomo.cloud.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 177.8 kB (17%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

866.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Starport.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 820.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 156.6 kB

  • Original 224.2 kB
  • After minification 222.7 kB
  • After compression 67.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 156.6 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 21.2 kB

  • Original 820.2 kB
  • After minification 799.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Starport images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Starport. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

71 ms

ignite.com

ignite.com

59 ms

container_py6JfPnv.js

container_py6JfPnv.js

63 ms

container_3tAZ59fg.js

container_3tAZ59fg.js

160996 ms

state.js

state.js

13 ms

c9136ed.js

c9136ed.js

160950 ms

9699936.js

9699936.js

160949 ms

516c48f.js

516c48f.js

160950 ms

70a4c62.js

70a4c62.js

160950 ms

a9ed440.js

a9ed440.js

160950 ms

f800f21.js

f800f21.js

160951 ms

1c391cd.js

1c391cd.js

160951 ms

a3543e6.js

a3543e6.js

160950 ms

8a367ca.js

8a367ca.js

160951 ms

124ee46.js

124ee46.js

160951 ms

0e7ed06.js

0e7ed06.js

160951 ms

cf1ad1e.js

cf1ad1e.js

160952 ms

ee0f596.js

ee0f596.js

160952 ms

aa0ff1b.js

aa0ff1b.js

160951 ms

60d1359.js

60d1359.js

160951 ms

a86998f.js

a86998f.js

160951 ms

ebec76c.js

ebec76c.js

160951 ms

1db4fed.js

1db4fed.js

160951 ms

eb2625a.js

eb2625a.js

160951 ms

490da9d.js

490da9d.js

160951 ms

a671255.js

a671255.js

160951 ms

02dc90a.js

02dc90a.js

160951 ms

0dcbfc4.js

0dcbfc4.js

160951 ms

1cdda35.js

1cdda35.js

160951 ms

6ed5074.js

6ed5074.js

160951 ms

402f883.js

402f883.js

160951 ms

768f96e.js

768f96e.js

160950 ms

f2b1635.js

f2b1635.js

160950 ms

1b58f26.js

1b58f26.js

160950 ms

f20c876.js

f20c876.js

160950 ms

ce287a4.js

ce287a4.js

160950 ms

f54a3fd.js

f54a3fd.js

160949 ms

cli-pannel-tuto.9f01b7c.png

cli-pannel-tuto.9f01b7c.png

160950 ms

cube-tech.d320881.png

cube-tech.d320881.png

160954 ms

cli-windows.bc2b6d3.png

cli-windows.bc2b6d3.png

160952 ms

pannel-cli.4e143fd.png

pannel-cli.4e143fd.png

160946 ms

matomo.php

matomo.php

534 ms

cli-scaffolding.0c5abe2.png

cli-scaffolding.0c5abe2.png

230 ms

cli-refresh.e25bb25.png

cli-refresh.e25bb25.png

258 ms

cli-config.f8ee5b1.png

cli-config.f8ee5b1.png

137 ms

cli-cross.7878a95.png

cli-cross.7878a95.png

232 ms

cli-prebuilt.ddfcde3.png

cli-prebuilt.ddfcde3.png

176 ms

cli-doc.29c0edf.png

cli-doc.29c0edf.png

162 ms

cli-cmd.392ef9d.png

cli-cmd.392ef9d.png

246 ms

cli-community.75fdc6a.png

cli-community.75fdc6a.png

336 ms

cli-community-man.a12c25c.png

cli-community-man.a12c25c.png

367 ms

Inter-Regular.3ac8302.woff

Inter-Regular.3ac8302.woff

403 ms

Inter-Medium.c0638be.woff

Inter-Medium.c0638be.woff

413 ms

Inter-Bold.99a0d9a.woff

Inter-Bold.99a0d9a.woff

277 ms

Inter-Black.d0b121f.woff

Inter-Black.d0b121f.woff

359 ms

Termina-Demi.07d99ea.woff

Termina-Demi.07d99ea.woff

411 ms

Accessibility Review

starport.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

starport.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

starport.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Starport.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Starport.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

starport.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Starport. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: