4.9 sec in total
142 ms
3.9 sec
917 ms
Welcome to starreviews.com homepage info - get ready to check Starreviews best content right away, or after learning these important things about starreviews.com
Reviews and Side by Side Comparisons of Personal financial and business services and websites.
Visit starreviews.comWe analyzed Starreviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 142 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
starreviews.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value1.2 s
100/100
25%
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
142 ms
1969 ms
152 ms
166 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Starreviews.com, 11% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Starreviews.com.
Page size can be reduced by 252.7 kB (33%)
775.3 kB
522.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Starreviews.com main page is 775.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 464.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 97.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Starreviews images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 109.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 109.7 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Starreviews.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (57%)
70
30
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Starreviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
starreviews.com
142 ms
www.starreviews.com
1969 ms
style.css
152 ms
pin-style.css
166 ms
jquery.min.js
34 ms
js.js
147 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
163 ms
adsbygoogle.js
5 ms
getseal
403 ms
comment-reply.min.js
86 ms
load-pinterest.js
281 ms
easy-pinning.js
279 ms
jquery.min.js
86 ms
bpopup.js
279 ms
getseal
594 ms
analytics.js
362 ms
googletag.png
548 ms
hero-avg.jpg
672 ms
hero_credit.jpg
671 ms
hero_quicken.jpg
620 ms
page_bg.gif
211 ms
logo.png
210 ms
nav_left.png
210 ms
navfill.gif
210 ms
nav_right.png
208 ms
textbook1-150x150.jpg
390 ms
shopper-150x150.jpg
405 ms
paddleboard-150x150.jpg
401 ms
large_debt_1-150x150.jpg
403 ms
finances-150x150.png
404 ms
sr_icon_man.jpg
398 ms
tv-icon.jpg
534 ms
closebutton.png
502 ms
signupnow.gif
502 ms
ca-pub-6864227551161423.js
363 ms
zrt_lookup.html
354 ms
show_ads_impl.js
138 ms
count.js
332 ms
ads
494 ms
osd.js
98 ms
collect
52 ms
widgets.js
150 ms
plusone.js
227 ms
all.js
107 ms
count-data.js
137 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
296 ms
291 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
84 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
120 ms
fastbutton
288 ms
xd_arbiter.php
55 ms
xd_arbiter.php
150 ms
m_js_controller.js
198 ms
abg.js
215 ms
postmessageRelay
234 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
140 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
142 ms
grlryt2bdKIyfMSOhzd1eA.woff
197 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
148 ms
favicon
161 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
160 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
47 ms
s
25 ms
x_button_blue2.png
22 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
151 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
70 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
7 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
20 ms
jot
99 ms
pinit.js
28 ms
ping
45 ms
pinit_main.js
60 ms
like.php
77 ms
starreviews.com accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
starreviews.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
starreviews.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Starreviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Starreviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
starreviews.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Starreviews. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: