1.1 sec in total
98 ms
799 ms
175 ms
Visit start.site now to see the best up-to-date Start content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about start.site
Have an interesting idea? Share it with us & stand a chance to win a 1-1 with a Shark, a Macbook Air, & other cool prizes. Bring your idea to life on .site!
Visit start.siteWe analyzed Start.site page load time and found that the first response time was 98 ms and then it took 974 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
start.site performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
50/100
10%
Value4.5 s
37/100
25%
Value4.3 s
76/100
10%
Value370 ms
71/100
30%
Value0.103
89/100
15%
Value5.7 s
68/100
10%
98 ms
50 ms
55 ms
41 ms
51 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Start.site, 12% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (562 ms) relates to the external source Techdomains.containers.piwik.pro.
Page size can be reduced by 18.2 kB (6%)
311.9 kB
293.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Start.site main page is 311.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 280.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Start images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 38 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 72 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Start.site has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (65%)
37
13
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Start. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
start.site
98 ms
css2
50 ms
css2
55 ms
bootstrap.min.css
41 ms
main.css
51 ms
oct.js
33 ms
email-decode.min.js
31 ms
jquery.min.js
37 ms
bootstrap.min.js
37 ms
parsley.min.js
46 ms
main.js
109 ms
j.php
155 ms
fbevents.js
76 ms
uwt.js
50 ms
28916b0d-633a-4583-8805-57a0d26c80d6.js
562 ms
logo-site.svg
68 ms
logo-partnership-namecheap.svg
69 ms
prize-1-new.png
73 ms
prize-2.png
107 ms
prize-3.png
107 ms
prize-4.png
107 ms
hero-highlight.svg
118 ms
info-icon.svg
127 ms
scroll-arrow.svg
131 ms
tick.svg
167 ms
footer-instagram.svg
158 ms
footer-twitter.svg
157 ms
step-1.svg
176 ms
step-2.svg
178 ms
step-3.svg
186 ms
about-site.png
237 ms
biggest-brands-mobile.svg
217 ms
footer-facebook.svg
218 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf
67 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf
71 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf
80 ms
adsct
221 ms
adsct
113 ms
adsct
195 ms
adsct
198 ms
v.gif
13 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21llEA.ttf
10 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLedw.ttf
11 ms
start.site accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
start.site best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
start.site SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Start.site can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Start.site main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
start.site
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Start. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: