6.3 sec in total
2.2 sec
3.8 sec
376 ms
Click here to check amazing Starter content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about starter.io
Starter Mobile and Web App Development Services, Platforms, and Tools, Lean business, Agile development, IoT, Wearable, Enterprise Startup Consulting.
Visit starter.ioWe analyzed Starter.io page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
starter.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value12.0 s
0/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value580 ms
51/100
30%
Value0.862
4/100
15%
Value7.9 s
44/100
10%
2208 ms
96 ms
156 ms
136 ms
186 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Starter.io, 1% (1 request) were made to Js.hs-scripts.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ws-na.amazon-adsystem.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Starter.io.
Page size can be reduced by 293.3 kB (21%)
1.4 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Starter.io main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 862.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Starter images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 143.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 143.3 kB or 40% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 46.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Starter.io needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 46.8 kB or 39% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (78%)
72
16
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Starter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
starter.io
2208 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
96 ms
style.min.css
156 ms
aalb_basics.css
136 ms
styles.css
186 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
145 ms
woocommerce.css
147 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
187 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
204 ms
rgs.css
214 ms
font-awesome.min.css
219 ms
steadysets.css
224 ms
linecon.css
255 ms
style.css
340 ms
responsive.css
351 ms
woocommerce.css
296 ms
style-wp.css
299 ms
generic-no-float.css
294 ms
jquery.js
389 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
362 ms
modernizr.js
363 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
458 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
425 ms
inline-comments.min.js
426 ms
js_composer_front.css
421 ms
core.min.js
410 ms
widget.min.js
431 ms
position.min.js
508 ms
menu.min.js
508 ms
wp-a11y.min.js
509 ms
autocomplete.min.js
510 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
509 ms
scripts.js
509 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
526 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
534 ms
js.cookie.min.js
550 ms
717498.js
43 ms
q
2 ms
woocommerce.min.js
558 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
505 ms
superfish.js
469 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
468 ms
easing.js
476 ms
respond.js
486 ms
swipe.min.js
484 ms
nicescroll.js
483 ms
sticky.js
476 ms
prettyPhoto.js
478 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
472 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
487 ms
carouFredSel.min.js
539 ms
appear.js
440 ms
init.js
458 ms
blog-masonry.js
457 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
416 ms
nectar-slider.js
487 ms
comment-reply.min.js
445 ms
nectar-love.js
460 ms
wp-embed.min.js
400 ms
js_composer_front.js
406 ms
starter_logo_2015_horizontal_v1.png
549 ms
logo_apn5017.png
548 ms
IMG_1242-50x50.jpg
547 ms
apple_watch_band-hero_2x-50x50.jpg
547 ms
evil_idea_stealer-50x50.jpg
509 ms
plantronics-50x50.jpg
507 ms
Screen-Shot-2014-03-10-at-1.49.07-PM-50x50.png
570 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
568 ms
linecons.ttf
576 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
575 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
575 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
624 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
665 ms
icomoon.woff
607 ms
2716.svg
180 ms
starter.io
522 ms
sunray-e1413134696427.jpg
420 ms
starter_hand_icon.jpg
260 ms
nectar-loading.gif
141 ms
diagonal_line.png
218 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
79 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
71 ms
starter.io accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
starter.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
starter.io SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Starter.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Starter.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
starter.io
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Starter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: