Tools & Wizards About Us
starwaypacker.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

starwaypacker.com

Starwaypacker: Top Best Packers and Movers | Movers and Packers in Bhopal,Indore,Jabalpur,Rewari,Itarsi

Page Load Speed

9.8 sec in total

First Response

847 ms

Resources Loaded

8.1 sec

Page Rendered

923 ms

starwaypacker.com screenshot

About Website

Visit starwaypacker.com now to see the best up-to-date Starwaypacker content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about starwaypacker.com

Starway Packers and movers is one of the best reliable and fast packers movers in Indore,Rohtak,Bhopal,Rishikesh,Haridwar,Bina,Hisar,Guna,Rewari,Jabalpur,Sonipat,Itarsi,Bahadurgarh.We provide car tran...

Visit starwaypacker.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Starwaypacker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 847 ms and then it took 9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

starwaypacker.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,920 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.starwaypacker.com

847 ms

js

206 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

353 ms

style.min.css

527 ms

styles.css

520 ms

Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Starwaypacker.com, 11% (9 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Starwaypacker.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 494.5 kB (23%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Starwaypacker.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 84.8 kB

  • Original 105.7 kB
  • After minification 104.1 kB
  • After compression 21.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 37.1 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Starwaypacker images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 52.7 kB

  • Original 299.0 kB
  • After minification 298.8 kB
  • After compression 246.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 52.7 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 320.0 kB

  • Original 460.9 kB
  • After minification 460.5 kB
  • After compression 140.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Starwaypacker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 320.0 kB or 69% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (65%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Starwaypacker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.starwaypacker.com

www.starwaypacker.com

847 ms

js

js

206 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

353 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

527 ms

styles.css

styles.css

520 ms

settings.css

settings.css

532 ms

style.css

style.css

526 ms

base.css

base.css

533 ms

layout.css

layout.css

831 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

995 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

778 ms

jquery.ui.all.css

jquery.ui.all.css

766 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

730 ms

jplayer.blue.monday.css

jplayer.blue.monday.css

737 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

976 ms

css

css

34 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1202 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

974 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

1437 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

1084 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1364 ms

index.js

index.js

1130 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1126 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

1193 ms

sortable.min.js

sortable.min.js

1395 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

1362 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

1474 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

1894 ms

menu.js

menu.js

1679 ms

animations.min.js

animations.min.js

1680 ms

jplayer.min.js

jplayer.min.js

1677 ms

translate3d.js

translate3d.js

1674 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

1675 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

2127 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

2127 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

2128 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

21 ms

collect

collect

17 ms

collect

collect

78 ms

backgroundPixels.jpg

backgroundPixels.jpg

2400 ms

banner2-1.jpg

banner2-1.jpg

2328 ms

banner-1-1.jpg

banner-1-1.jpg

2348 ms

banner3-1-5.jpg

banner3-1-5.jpg

2327 ms

logo1.png

logo1.png

774 ms

packing-for-a-move-2.jpg

packing-for-a-move-2.jpg

2329 ms

28972_1480403963-2.jpeg

28972_1480403963-2.jpeg

2329 ms

28972_1480403963-1-2.jpeg

28972_1480403963-1-2.jpeg

2329 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

2345 ms

Loading-Unloading-Services-1.jpg

Loading-Unloading-Services-1.jpg

3354 ms

household.jpg

household.jpg

3680 ms

11.png

11.png

2343 ms

11-1.png

11-1.png

2344 ms

mfn-icons.woff

mfn-icons.woff

2261 ms

KtFP5C9zjvQ

KtFP5C9zjvQ

597 ms

HiKLrSAYLfk

HiKLrSAYLfk

613 ms

R9Zswp18DC0

R9Zswp18DC0

606 ms

backgroundPixels.jpg

backgroundPixels.jpg

510 ms

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

1505 ms

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js

1484 ms

wp-polyfill-url.min.js

wp-polyfill-url.min.js

1685 ms

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

1684 ms

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

1686 ms

wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js

wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js

1686 ms

ieVi2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-33mZGCQYag.ttf

ieVi2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-33mZGCQYag.ttf

38 ms

ieVl2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-19K7CA.ttf

ieVl2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-19K7CA.ttf

40 ms

ieVi2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-32meGCQYag.ttf

ieVi2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-32meGCQYag.ttf

41 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

82 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

200 ms

base.js

base.js

322 ms

fetch-polyfill.js

fetch-polyfill.js

80 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

1141 ms

id

id

883 ms

GMxt2AoYqj2WXpyEdgkoen9XiD3znMxv6lengZkwUWM.js

GMxt2AoYqj2WXpyEdgkoen9XiD3znMxv6lengZkwUWM.js

746 ms

embed.js

embed.js

366 ms

id

id

330 ms

zVL0qRr3dbQ5f-Xr-uvCrkOcgLrlGoDuIshvtmLe0dw.js

zVL0qRr3dbQ5f-Xr-uvCrkOcgLrlGoDuIshvtmLe0dw.js

459 ms

Create

Create

927 ms

Create

Create

923 ms

Create

Create

1067 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

882 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

848 ms

log_event

log_event

828 ms

Accessibility Review

starwaypacker.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

starwaypacker.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

starwaypacker.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Starwaypacker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Starwaypacker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

starwaypacker.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Starwaypacker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: