Tools & Wizards About Us
staticguardslondon.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 1

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    19% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

staticguardslondon.co.uk

Security Company Wolverhampton | Region Security Guarding | Security

Page Load Speed

9.9 sec in total

First Response

187 ms

Resources Loaded

9.3 sec

Page Rendered

502 ms

staticguardslondon.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Staticguardslondon content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about staticguardslondon.co.uk

Security Company Wolverhampton | Region Security Guarding | SIA Licensed Security Company Based in Wolverhampton | Quality Security Services

Visit staticguardslondon.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Staticguardslondon.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 187 ms and then it took 9.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

staticguardslondon.co.uk performance score

1

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,990 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.018

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.0 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

staticguardslondon.co.uk

187 ms

www.regionsecurityguarding.co.uk

5748 ms

front.min.css

95 ms

style.min.css

190 ms

font-awesome.min.css

269 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Staticguardslondon.co.uk, 56% (42 requests) were made to Regionsecurityguarding.co.uk and 8% (6 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.7 sec) relates to the external source Regionsecurityguarding.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 170.9 kB (52%)

Content Size

326.5 kB

After Optimization

155.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Staticguardslondon.co.uk main page is 326.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 197.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 166.3 kB

  • Original 197.9 kB
  • After minification 187.5 kB
  • After compression 31.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 166.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 19.7 kB
  • After minification 16.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Staticguardslondon needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.8 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 108.9 kB
  • After minification 108.8 kB
  • After compression 107.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (83%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Staticguardslondon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

staticguardslondon.co.uk

staticguardslondon.co.uk

187 ms

www.regionsecurityguarding.co.uk

www.regionsecurityguarding.co.uk

5748 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

95 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

190 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

269 ms

mystickyelements-front.min.css

mystickyelements-front.min.css

358 ms

intlTelInput.css

intlTelInput.css

267 ms

style-static.min.css

style-static.min.css

458 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

369 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

280 ms

ie-compat.min.js

ie-compat.min.js

362 ms

js

js

48 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

41 ms

uCoJm0DUoS984gAh

uCoJm0DUoS984gAh

131 ms

et-core-unified-1713.min.css

et-core-unified-1713.min.css

362 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

369 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

445 ms

msf-vendor.min.css

msf-vendor.min.css

594 ms

msf-frontend.min.css

msf-frontend.min.css

450 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

539 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

626 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

593 ms

common.js

common.js

626 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

626 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

626 ms

mystickyelements-fronted.min.js

mystickyelements-fronted.min.js

757 ms

intlTelInput.js

intlTelInput.js

757 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

756 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

757 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

756 ms

msf-vendor.min.js

msf-vendor.min.js

756 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

837 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

849 ms

msf-frontend.min.js

msf-frontend.min.js

837 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

853 ms

jquery.mobile.js

jquery.mobile.js

836 ms

sticky-elements.js

sticky-elements.js

925 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

210 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

127 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

125 ms

bat.js

bat.js

258 ms

stat.js

stat.js

284 ms

preloader.gif

preloader.gif

477 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

288 ms

loader.js

loader.js

249 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

211 ms

default

default

500 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

469 ms

api.min.js

api.min.js

168 ms

434161725426117

434161725426117

117 ms

cropped-full-logo.png

cropped-full-logo.png

306 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

456 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

455 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

455 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

379 ms

collect

collect

111 ms

web-vitals.iife.js

web-vitals.iife.js

164 ms

collect

collect

145 ms

26163955.js

26163955.js

76 ms

call-tracking_7.js

call-tracking_7.js

60 ms

collect

collect

80 ms

172 ms

244 ms

247 ms

26163955

26163955

161 ms

web-vitals.iife.js

web-vitals.iife.js

19 ms

www.regionsecurityguarding.co.uk

www.regionsecurityguarding.co.uk

365 ms

wcm

wcm

78 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

214 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

56 ms

56 ms

35 ms

51 ms

wcm

wcm

16 ms

15 ms

Accessibility Review

staticguardslondon.co.uk accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

staticguardslondon.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

staticguardslondon.co.uk SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Staticguardslondon.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Staticguardslondon.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

staticguardslondon.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Staticguardslondon. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: