Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

stedham.com

Stedham Electronics Closure - Bürkert Fluid Control Systems

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

94 ms

stedham.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to stedham.com homepage info - get ready to check Stedham best content right away, or after learning these important things about stedham.com

In October 2021, Stedham Electronics closed its doors permanently and remaining assets were acquired by Burkert USA Corp.

Visit stedham.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stedham.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stedham.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.0 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,550 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.025

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.1 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stedham.com

1105 ms

Stedham-Electronics-Closure

476 ms

Stedham-Electronics-Closure

622 ms

style.css

66 ms

custom.css

57 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Stedham.com, 61% (23 requests) were made to Burkert.com and 37% (14 requests) were made to Burkert-usa.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Stedham.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (63%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

776.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Stedham.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 989.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 121.4 kB

  • Original 141.4 kB
  • After minification 119.5 kB
  • After compression 20.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.9 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 121.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 10 B

  • Original 31.7 kB
  • After minification 31.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stedham images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 422.7 kB

  • Original 989.6 kB
  • After minification 806.3 kB
  • After compression 567.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 422.7 kB or 43% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 755.0 kB

  • Original 913.3 kB
  • After minification 838.4 kB
  • After compression 158.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stedham.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 755.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (48%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stedham. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

stedham.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a valid value for its [lang] attribute.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

stedham.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

stedham.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    LA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stedham.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Latin language. Our system also found out that Stedham.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stedham. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: