Tools & Wizards About Us
steding.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

steding.com

Page Load Speed

137 ms in total

First Response

40 ms

Resources Loaded

43 ms

Page Rendered

54 ms

steding.com screenshot

About Website

Visit steding.com now to see the best up-to-date Steding content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about steding.com

Visit steding.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Steding.com page load time and found that the first response time was 40 ms and then it took 97 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

steding.com performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

steding.com

40 ms

bOJzwxnKG.js

3 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Steding.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (40 ms) belongs to the original domain Steding.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 442 B (1%)

Content Size

56.7 kB

After Optimization

56.3 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Steding.com main page is 56.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 55.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 288 B

  • Original 1.0 kB
  • After minification 1.0 kB
  • After compression 747 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 288 B or 28% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 154 B

  • Original 55.7 kB
  • After minification 55.7 kB
  • After compression 55.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Steding. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

steding.com

steding.com

40 ms

bOJzwxnKG.js

bOJzwxnKG.js

3 ms

Accessibility Review

steding.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

steding.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

steding.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Steding.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Steding.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

steding.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Steding. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: