Tools & Wizards About Us
stellarone.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

stellarone.in

StellarOne - Where Trust, Quality and Location converge 3/4 BHK apartments

Page Load Speed

6.9 sec in total

First Response

823 ms

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

758 ms

stellarone.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to stellarone.in homepage info - get ready to check Stellar One best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about stellarone.in

Visit stellarone.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Stellarone.in page load time and found that the first response time was 823 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stellarone.in performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.8 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

63/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stellarone.in

823 ms

plugins.css

994 ms

style.css

1238 ms

player.js

46 ms

jquery-3.6.3.min.js

1511 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Stellarone.in, 11% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Player.vimeo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Stellarone.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 198.9 kB (3%)

Content Size

5.8 MB

After Optimization

5.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stellarone.in main page is 5.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 29.0 kB

  • Original 33.4 kB
  • After minification 25.3 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.1 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 89.4 kB

  • Original 5.5 MB
  • After minification 5.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stellar One images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 41.0 kB

  • Original 156.3 kB
  • After minification 156.3 kB
  • After compression 115.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 41.0 kB or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 39.5 kB

  • Original 91.3 kB
  • After minification 90.5 kB
  • After compression 51.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stellarone.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39.5 kB or 43% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (56%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stellar One. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

stellarone.in

stellarone.in

823 ms

plugins.css

plugins.css

994 ms

style.css

style.css

1238 ms

player.js

player.js

46 ms

jquery-3.6.3.min.js

jquery-3.6.3.min.js

1511 ms

jquery-migrate-3.0.0.min.js

jquery-migrate-3.0.0.min.js

1036 ms

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

1041 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

1043 ms

jquery.isotope.v3.0.2.js

jquery.isotope.v3.0.2.js

1488 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

1295 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1550 ms

scrollIt.min.js

scrollIt.min.js

1301 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

1483 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1553 ms

jquery.stellar.min.js

jquery.stellar.min.js

1563 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

1737 ms

YouTubePopUp.js

YouTubePopUp.js

1737 ms

before-after.js

before-after.js

1766 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1812 ms

stellar-logo.png

stellar-logo.png

2063 ms

Stellar-One-phase-II.jpg

Stellar-One-phase-II.jpg

2835 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

2709 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

2956 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

2752 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

2820 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

3072 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

3198 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

3008 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

3077 ms

celebration-lawn.png

celebration-lawn.png

3095 ms

groceries.png

groceries.png

3204 ms

multipurpose-hall.png

multipurpose-hall.png

3261 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

2354 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

2366 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

2369 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

2462 ms

themify-icons.css

themify-icons.css

2468 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

2525 ms

YouTubePopUp.css

YouTubePopUp.css

2609 ms

before-after.css

before-after.css

2571 ms

css2

css2

34 ms

wEO_EBrOk8hQLDvIAF8FUfAN3Eo.ttf

wEO_EBrOk8hQLDvIAF8FUfAN3Eo.ttf

93 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-Y3tco5q6.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-Y3tco5q6.ttf

279 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-Y3tco5q6.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-Y3tco5q6.ttf

283 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-Y3tco5q6.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-Y3tco5q6.ttf

284 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-Y3tco5q6.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-Y3tco5q6.ttf

282 ms

themify.woff

themify.woff

280 ms

ahcfv8qz1zt6hCC5G4F_P4ASpUySoULk.ttf

ahcfv8qz1zt6hCC5G4F_P4ASpUySoULk.ttf

282 ms

banner2.jpg

banner2.jpg

304 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

538 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

304 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

555 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

536 ms

Accessibility Review

stellarone.in accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

stellarone.in best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

stellarone.in SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stellarone.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stellarone.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stellarone.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stellar One. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: