2 sec in total
430 ms
1.5 sec
104 ms
Click here to check amazing Stencil Board content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stencilboard.at
communitybased collection of stencilgraffiti
Visit stencilboard.atWe analyzed Stencilboard.at page load time and found that the first response time was 430 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
stencilboard.at performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
85/100
10%
Value3.1 s
74/100
25%
Value2.5 s
97/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.0 s
99/100
10%
430 ms
221 ms
213 ms
6 ms
7 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Stencilboard.at, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Statcounter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (614 ms) belongs to the original domain Stencilboard.at.
Page size can be reduced by 40.5 kB (66%)
61.6 kB
21.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Stencilboard.at main page is 61.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 30.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 5.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.4 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stencil Board images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 16.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 16.4 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stencilboard.at needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (61%)
28
11
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stencil Board. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
stencilboard.at
430 ms
stnclbrd.js
221 ms
stnclbrd_s_dev.css
213 ms
urchin.js
6 ms
counter_xhtml.js
7 ms
stnclbrd_main_s_dev.css
218 ms
stnclbrd_submenue_s_dev.css
211 ms
1941a_ttt_s.jpg
213 ms
1940a_sadfsadf_s.jpg
205 ms
rss_ico03.gif
247 ms
delicious.png
248 ms
facebook.png
410 ms
digg.png
412 ms
logo_stnclbrd.gif
195 ms
bg_index.gif
204 ms
bt_mainnav_home.gif
207 ms
bt_mainnav_gallery.gif
209 ms
bt_mainnav_upload.gif
391 ms
bt_mainnav_slideshow.gif
392 ms
bt_mainnav_info.gif
397 ms
bt_mainnav_links.gif
408 ms
bg_submenueempty.gif
408 ms
bg_indexbanner.gif
412 ms
bg_latest_frame.gif
592 ms
bt_index01.gif
596 ms
bt_index02.gif
600 ms
bt_index03.gif
611 ms
bt_index04.gif
611 ms
bt_bg_footerlink01.gif
614 ms
__utm.gif
9 ms
t.php
58 ms
stencilboard.at accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
stencilboard.at best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
stencilboard.at SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stencilboard.at can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stencilboard.at main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
stencilboard.at
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stencil Board. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: