Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

Page Load Speed

9.7 sec in total

First Response

1.7 sec

Resources Loaded

7.4 sec

Page Rendered

572 ms

steppingfwd.com screenshot

About Website

Visit steppingfwd.com now to see the best up-to-date Steppingfwd content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about steppingfwd.com

Visit steppingfwd.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Steppingfwd.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

steppingfwd.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value30.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.6 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,140 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.189

65/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.7 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

steppingfwd.com

1682 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

242 ms

style.min.css

517 ms

classic-themes.min.css

208 ms

styles.css

219 ms

Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Steppingfwd.com, 24% (26 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Steppingfwd.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (42%)

Content Size

4.5 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Steppingfwd.com main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 80.3 kB

  • Original 97.4 kB
  • After minification 94.9 kB
  • After compression 17.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 23.9 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Steppingfwd images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 532.5 kB

  • Original 939.4 kB
  • After minification 880.6 kB
  • After compression 406.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 532.5 kB or 57% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 231.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Steppingfwd.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (88%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Steppingfwd. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

steppingfwd.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

steppingfwd.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

steppingfwd.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Steppingfwd.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Steppingfwd.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Steppingfwd. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: