Tools & Wizards About Us
sterlingweb.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

sterlingweb.in

Sterling Web | Web Design & Development Company nashik

Page Load Speed

8.7 sec in total

First Response

148 ms

Resources Loaded

7.9 sec

Page Rendered

613 ms

sterlingweb.in screenshot

About Website

Visit sterlingweb.in now to see the best up-to-date Sterling Web content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sterlingweb.in

A leading Web design & development company Nashik which specializes in PHP, SEO/SMO, WordPress, Web Designing services and IT Training's in Nashik, India.

Visit sterlingweb.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Sterlingweb.in page load time and found that the first response time was 148 ms and then it took 8.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sterlingweb.in performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

23/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.022

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

62/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sterlingweb.in

148 ms

sterlingweb.in

6357 ms

js

66 ms

style.min.css

145 ms

utilities.css

221 ms

Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Sterlingweb.in, 27% (28 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Sterlingweb.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 924.1 kB (20%)

Content Size

4.6 MB

After Optimization

3.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sterlingweb.in main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 60.0 kB

  • Original 72.3 kB
  • After minification 61.9 kB
  • After compression 12.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.4 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 783.6 kB

  • Original 4.2 MB
  • After minification 3.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sterling Web needs image optimization as it can save up to 783.6 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 24.4 kB

  • Original 117.6 kB
  • After minification 117.6 kB
  • After compression 93.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 24.4 kB or 21% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 56.0 kB

  • Original 181.1 kB
  • After minification 181.1 kB
  • After compression 125.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sterlingweb.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 56.0 kB or 31% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (58%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sterling Web. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sterlingweb.in

sterlingweb.in

148 ms

sterlingweb.in

sterlingweb.in

6357 ms

js

js

66 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

145 ms

utilities.css

utilities.css

221 ms

styles.css

styles.css

448 ms

css

css

39 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

282 ms

jpreloader.css

jpreloader.css

210 ms

animate.css

animate.css

216 ms

plugin.css

plugin.css

218 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

292 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

302 ms

owl.transitions.css

owl.transitions.css

301 ms

style.css

style.css

309 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

350 ms

bg.css

bg.css

360 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

369 ms

color.php

color.php

607 ms

settings.css

settings.css

404 ms

rev-settings.css

rev-settings.css

420 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

452 ms

style.css

style.css

450 ms

style.css

style.css

478 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

581 ms

utilities.js

utilities.js

513 ms

lte-ie7.js

lte-ie7.js

533 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

615 ms

css

css

51 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

503 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

557 ms

index.js

index.js

675 ms

index.js

index.js

675 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

675 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

676 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

696 ms

total1.js

total1.js

677 ms

classie.js

classie.js

677 ms

video.resize.js

video.resize.js

723 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

736 ms

enquire.min.js

enquire.min.js

722 ms

designesia.js

designesia.js

677 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

610 ms

css

css

23 ms

css

css

39 ms

css

css

42 ms

horizontal-copy.png

horizontal-copy.png

266 ms

bg3.png

bg3.png

591 ms

communicate1.png

communicate1.png

266 ms

reply.png

reply.png

266 ms

help1.png

help1.png

267 ms

never_hide1.png

never_hide1.png

267 ms

promises1.png

promises1.png

266 ms

development1.png

development1.png

302 ms

learn1.png

learn1.png

306 ms

change1.png

change1.png

325 ms

equal1.png

equal1.png

323 ms

focus1.png

focus1.png

323 ms

trust1.png

trust1.png

366 ms

complete1.png

complete1.png

389 ms

p14-3i1npz7nxb2kdw8b2xryf4.png

p14-3i1npz7nxb2kdw8b2xryf4.png

618 ms

p10-3i1npz7nxb2kdw8b2xryf4.png

p10-3i1npz7nxb2kdw8b2xryf4.png

618 ms

p2-3i1npz7nxb2kdw8b2xryf4.png

p2-3i1npz7nxb2kdw8b2xryf4.png

562 ms

p9-3i1npzc6rllr5xz6gsym0w.png

p9-3i1npzc6rllr5xz6gsym0w.png

615 ms

p7-3i1npzc6rllr5xz6gsym0w.png

p7-3i1npzc6rllr5xz6gsym0w.png

624 ms

p12-3i1npzc6rllr5xz6gsym0w.png

p12-3i1npzc6rllr5xz6gsym0w.png

692 ms

p3-3i1npz7nxb2kdw8b2xryf4.png

p3-3i1npz7nxb2kdw8b2xryf4.png

672 ms

bgimage.jpg.png

bgimage.jpg.png

682 ms

bg2.png

bg2.png

761 ms

creative1.png

creative1.png

612 ms

finallogo.png

finallogo.png

625 ms

me-select2.png

me-select2.png

668 ms

crysta1l1.png

crysta1l1.png

687 ms

footerlogo2.png

footerlogo2.png

685 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

86 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

92 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4uaVc.ttf

92 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

91 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

91 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

180 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJN7Ml2xMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJN7Ml2xMB.ttf

35 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJN7Ml1RMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJN7Ml1RMB.ttf

102 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJBbMl2xMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJBbMl2xMB.ttf

59 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJBbMl1RMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJBbMl1RMB.ttf

183 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJabMl2xMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJabMl2xMB.ttf

67 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJabMl1RMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJabMl1RMB.ttf

182 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ml2xMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ml2xMB.ttf

66 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ml1RMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ml1RMB.ttf

182 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ6bQl2xMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ6bQl2xMB.ttf

84 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ6bQl1RMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ6bQl1RMB.ttf

182 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ0LQl2xMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ0LQl2xMB.ttf

84 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ0LQl1RMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ0LQl1RMB.ttf

182 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ql2xMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ql2xMB.ttf

84 ms

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ql1RMB.ttf

HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ql1RMB.ttf

182 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

734 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

83 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

86 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

85 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

89 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

89 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

89 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

88 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

99 ms

et-line.woff

et-line.woff

712 ms

Accessibility Review

sterlingweb.in accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sterlingweb.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

sterlingweb.in SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sterlingweb.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sterlingweb.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sterlingweb.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sterling Web. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: