Tools & Wizards About Us
stgr.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

stgr.com

Stagecoach Trails Guest Ranch - All Inclusive Dude Ranch Vacations

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

204 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

513 ms

stgr.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to stgr.com homepage info - get ready to check Stgr best content right away, or after learning these important things about stgr.com

Authentic western experience in the heart of cowboy country. All inclusive dude ranch located in NW Arizona. Horseriding, ATV, Archery & more

Visit stgr.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stgr.com page load time and found that the first response time was 204 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stgr.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.0 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value840 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.5 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stgr.com

204 ms

stgr.com

353 ms

www.stagecoachtrailsranch.com

453 ms

autoptimize_bdfec8e01b896b241d311a4848a1efeb.css

186 ms

jquery.min.js

247 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Stgr.com, 61% (23 requests) were made to Stagecoachtrailsranch.com and 26% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (478 ms) relates to the external source Stagecoachtrailsranch.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 152.8 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stgr.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 41.5 kB

  • Original 53.7 kB
  • After minification 53.5 kB
  • After compression 12.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stgr images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 87.4 kB

  • Original 387.2 kB
  • After minification 387.2 kB
  • After compression 299.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 87.4 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 20.4 kB

  • Original 64.6 kB
  • After minification 64.6 kB
  • After compression 44.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stgr.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.4 kB or 32% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (17%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stgr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

stgr.com

stgr.com

204 ms

stgr.com

stgr.com

353 ms

www.stagecoachtrailsranch.com

www.stagecoachtrailsranch.com

453 ms

autoptimize_bdfec8e01b896b241d311a4848a1efeb.css

autoptimize_bdfec8e01b896b241d311a4848a1efeb.css

186 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

247 ms

js

js

60 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

137 ms

autoptimize_9318e8259de06c83757cf67409f08227.js

autoptimize_9318e8259de06c83757cf67409f08227.js

478 ms

css

css

32 ms

nav-bg.jpg

nav-bg.jpg

122 ms

ranch1nnns.jpg

ranch1nnns.jpg

192 ms

ranchslide16nns.jpg

ranchslide16nns.jpg

192 ms

ranchslide3bb.jpg

ranchslide3bb.jpg

352 ms

ranchslide9ns.jpg

ranchslide9ns.jpg

374 ms

ranchslide3ns.jpg

ranchslide3ns.jpg

370 ms

ranchslide7ns.jpg

ranchslide7ns.jpg

363 ms

ranchslide2bcns.jpg

ranchslide2bcns.jpg

366 ms

ranchslide5ns.jpg

ranchslide5ns.jpg

314 ms

nav-bg.png

nav-bg.png

170 ms

subnav-bg.jpg

subnav-bg.jpg

263 ms

body-bg.jpg

body-bg.jpg

315 ms

content-bg.png

content-bg.png

200 ms

footer-bg.jpg

footer-bg.jpg

320 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3TtA.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3TtA.woff

31 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3Ttw.ttf

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3Ttw.ttf

55 ms

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgo6ew.woff

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgo6ew.woff

67 ms

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgo6eA.ttf

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgo6eA.ttf

81 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzTtA.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzTtA.woff

67 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzTtw.ttf

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzTtw.ttf

106 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvTtA.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvTtA.woff

66 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvTtw.ttf

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvTtw.ttf

65 ms

r05XGLJT86YzEZ7o.ttf

r05XGLJT86YzEZ7o.ttf

93 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

306 ms

SZc83FzrJKuqFbwMKk6EhUXz6A.ttf

SZc83FzrJKuqFbwMKk6EhUXz6A.ttf

105 ms

ga-4507839525a19180914799b08fb5fa5b.js

ga-4507839525a19180914799b08fb5fa5b.js

340 ms

logo.png

logo.png

167 ms

collect

collect

28 ms

autoptimize_71e831002f89a3a55c0f672cb7881814.css

autoptimize_71e831002f89a3a55c0f672cb7881814.css

75 ms

Accessibility Review

stgr.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

stgr.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

stgr.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stgr.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stgr.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stgr.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stgr. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: