Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

stihl.in

STIHL India – The Number One Selling Brand of Chainsaws | STIHL India

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

349 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

291 ms

stihl.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing STIHL content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stihl.in

The Number One Selling Brand of Chainsaws! STIHL India empowers you with high-tech motorized garden tools like chainsaws, brushcutters and more!

Visit stihl.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Stihl.in page load time and found that the first response time was 349 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stihl.in performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value730 ms

40/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.429

22/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stihl.in

349 ms

www.stihl.in

820 ms

screen1.css

352 ms

screen2.css

372 ms

lib.min.js

382 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Stihl.in, 58% (18 requests) were made to Static.stihl.com and 10% (3 requests) were made to Wm.wiredminds.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (820 ms) belongs to the original domain Stihl.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 613.1 kB (33%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Stihl.in main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 15.2 kB

  • Original 19.7 kB
  • After minification 14.3 kB
  • After compression 4.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.3 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 25.7 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 999.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. STIHL images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 421.4 kB

  • Original 589.0 kB
  • After minification 575.0 kB
  • After compression 167.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 421.4 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 150.8 kB

  • Original 220.2 kB
  • After minification 187.5 kB
  • After compression 69.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stihl.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 150.8 kB or 68% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (29%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of STIHL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

stihl.in accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

stihl.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

stihl.in SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stihl.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stihl.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of STIHL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: