3.4 sec in total
29 ms
2.9 sec
505 ms
Visit stink.co now to see the best up-to-date Stink content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stink.co
We are a global creative network in advertising, technology and entertainment.
Visit stink.coWe analyzed Stink.co page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
stink.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
80/100
10%
Value5.1 s
25/100
25%
Value2.5 s
97/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.104
88/100
15%
Value2.2 s
99/100
10%
29 ms
330 ms
159 ms
503 ms
15 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Stink.co, 45% (13 requests) were made to Stink-site-media-prod-new.s3.amazonaws.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source Stink-site-media-prod-new.s3.amazonaws.com.
Page size can be reduced by 508.7 kB (7%)
7.0 MB
6.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Stink.co main page is 7.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.2 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 263.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stink images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 193.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 193.0 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 38.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stink.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 38.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (14%)
22
19
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stink. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
stink.co
29 ms
main.min.css
330 ms
modernizr.js
159 ms
main.min.js
503 ms
2b5184
15 ms
1e76b5e1b801e3be8622e0ad2ab99fc4dffc7d65e4d041f162d0f2a6_400
418 ms
8dc153c6d484afda7c8dcd652a1e63783dfb0bcb12a0ff5b1ea8dfbb_400
430 ms
fcb923373e298da25a6e6cf119d971804de9f8c786fa444f3ebf276b_400
514 ms
976d2da89e97e17a46052cf9f1f76befad869705ca9c8cab6c5ace9c_400
427 ms
0cd403a84dc6d13f3479e56b0c7c9196536a6e63330b357fc25ddd11_610
993 ms
8fd5b10dac4da2163708e7882c0b6470fe0e73c2a6f87480caa6180d_610
964 ms
51452042214b7b26b4d8be5ba044b0c666c2ec6111b07730a0b73eef_610
1051 ms
725f69b2e9e74fae14691df54467bb5873e17678a15589323384736f_610
1044 ms
ca429b4914819ac736b95f549b45043f89aa97d5eca7178acb8d8524_610
609 ms
stink.svg
128 ms
2CCDB9_1_0.woff
307 ms
2CCDB9_0_0.woff
176 ms
TiemposHeadlineWeb-Medium.woff
311 ms
TiemposTextWeb-Regular.woff
312 ms
TiemposHeadlineWeb-Black.woff
412 ms
icomoon.woff
267 ms
analytics.js
26 ms
who.js
357 ms
e41f9eed9035dc52fd4bb934a28dc8f9fc87a777aff4b50122b2e5de_1820
2262 ms
0cd403a84dc6d13f3479e56b0c7c9196536a6e63330b357fc25ddd11_1820
1747 ms
ca429b4914819ac736b95f549b45043f89aa97d5eca7178acb8d8524
1617 ms
96e2421e3b70c1e8632df37c7615a0d84b3946337bbefb0112a5c84c
1600 ms
collect
26 ms
who.ashx
92 ms
stink.co accessibility score
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
stink.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
stink.co SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stink.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stink.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stink.co
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stink. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: