Tools & Wizards About Us
stitchwell.co.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

stitchwell.co.in

Stitchwell | Tapered Suture Needle, Taper Cut Needle, Glarefree Black Needle, Surgical Straight Needle, Taper Point Blunt End Needle, Round Body Needl...

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

497 ms

Resources Loaded

5.2 sec

Page Rendered

575 ms

stitchwell.co.in screenshot

About Website

Visit stitchwell.co.in now to see the best up-to-date Stitchwell content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stitchwell.co.in

Stitchwell is one of the manufacturers, suppliers and exporters of qualited Drilled End Suture Needles (Atraumatic Needles) in the world. Our industry aims at producing quality surgical needles at an ...

Visit stitchwell.co.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Stitchwell.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 497 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stitchwell.co.in performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.395

26/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.5 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stitchwell.co.in

497 ms

stitchwell.co.in

1097 ms

css

41 ms

css

57 ms

css

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Stitchwell.co.in, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Stitchwell.co.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (44%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stitchwell.co.in main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 33.9 kB

  • Original 39.1 kB
  • After minification 27.3 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.8 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.9 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Stitchwell needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 50% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 70.6 kB

  • Original 481.6 kB
  • After minification 481.6 kB
  • After compression 411.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 70.6 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 6.8 kB

  • Original 82.7 kB
  • After minification 82.7 kB
  • After compression 75.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stitchwell.co.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (55%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stitchwell. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

stitchwell.co.in

stitchwell.co.in

497 ms

stitchwell.co.in

stitchwell.co.in

1097 ms

css

css

41 ms

css

css

57 ms

css

css

59 ms

css

css

63 ms

css

css

61 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

40 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

486 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

713 ms

icomoon-icons.css

icomoon-icons.css

725 ms

animate.css

animate.css

726 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

722 ms

owl.css

owl.css

728 ms

animation.css

animation.css

728 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

951 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

964 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css

966 ms

menu.css

menu.css

968 ms

style.css

style.css

1213 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

966 ms

api.js

api.js

40 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1426 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

1208 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

1951 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1209 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

1481 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

1463 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js

1463 ms

owl.js

owl.js

1464 ms

paroller.js

paroller.js

1665 ms

wow.js

wow.js

1693 ms

main.js

main.js

1695 ms

nav-tool.js

nav-tool.js

1696 ms

appear.js

appear.js

1721 ms

script.js

script.js

1902 ms

logo.png

logo.png

1933 ms

s1-a.png

s1-a.png

2895 ms

s2-a.png

s2-a.png

2897 ms

s3-a.png

s3-a.png

2440 ms

about.png

about.png

3097 ms

blunt-end-needle1.jpg

blunt-end-needle1.jpg

2414 ms

conventional-cutting-needle1.jpg

conventional-cutting-needle1.jpg

2190 ms

glarefree-black-needles1.jpg

glarefree-black-needles1.jpg

2470 ms

rc1.jpg

rc1.jpg

2654 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

21 ms

straight-needles1.jpg

straight-needles1.jpg

2194 ms

taper-point-blunt-end-needle1.jpg

taper-point-blunt-end-needle1.jpg

2003 ms

zeboto-logo.png

zeboto-logo.png

2179 ms

pattern-2.png

pattern-2.png

1701 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

2210 ms

pattern-10.png

pattern-10.png

1915 ms

pattern-7.png

pattern-7.png

1914 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

1915 ms

14.jpg

14.jpg

2188 ms

cross-out.png

cross-out.png

2109 ms

flaticon.html

flaticon.html

2042 ms

flaticon.woff

flaticon.woff

2043 ms

font

font

26 ms

font

font

102 ms

icomoondb79.ttf

icomoondb79.ttf

2059 ms

font

font

38 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

13 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

1583 ms

font

font

13 ms

font

font

14 ms

Accessibility Review

stitchwell.co.in accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

stitchwell.co.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

stitchwell.co.in SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stitchwell.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stitchwell.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stitchwell.co.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stitchwell. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: