4.1 sec in total
82 ms
3.6 sec
402 ms
Visit stls.net now to see the best up-to-date St Ls content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stls.net
Visit stls.netWe analyzed Stls.net page load time and found that the first response time was 82 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
stls.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.0 s
0/100
10%
Value17.9 s
0/100
25%
Value26.4 s
0/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value15.6 s
6/100
10%
82 ms
2035 ms
236 ms
165 ms
239 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Stls.net, 79% (50 requests) were made to Stcr.org and 17% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source Stcr.org.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (48%)
3.0 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Stls.net main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 80.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 170.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, St Ls needs image optimization as it can save up to 170.1 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 267.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 267.8 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 922.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stls.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 922.2 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (81%)
47
9
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of St Ls. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stls.net
82 ms
www.stcr.org
2035 ms
classic-themes.min.css
236 ms
style.min.css
165 ms
theme.min.css
239 ms
header-footer.min.css
239 ms
frontend.min.css
566 ms
general.min.css
244 ms
eael-11.css
247 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
246 ms
swiper.min.css
316 ms
post-10.css
316 ms
frontend.min.css
1092 ms
all.min.css
406 ms
v4-shims.min.css
327 ms
global.css
627 ms
post-11.css
394 ms
post-1273.css
410 ms
post-1282.css
472 ms
css
27 ms
fontawesome.min.css
568 ms
solid.min.css
493 ms
regular.min.css
550 ms
brands.min.css
575 ms
jquery.min.js
783 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
642 ms
v4-shims.min.js
647 ms
general.min.js
581 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
649 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
651 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
662 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
705 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
733 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
735 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
744 ms
hooks.min.js
784 ms
i18n.min.js
784 ms
frontend.min.js
813 ms
waypoints.min.js
742 ms
core.min.js
749 ms
frontend.min.js
708 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
709 ms
StThomas-Logo-220x80-1.png
181 ms
bg-about-1920x650-2.jpg
396 ms
STLC-2.jpg
110 ms
1942.jpg
169 ms
st-thomas-lutheran-early-childhood-center.png
166 ms
SGOLogo-300x148.png
110 ms
bg-about-1920x650-1.jpg
427 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
291 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
202 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
210 ms
xfuu0WDhWW_fOEoY8l_VPNZfB7jPM6_GDlc0feI.ttf
22 ms
xfuu0WDhWW_fOEoY8l_VPNZfB7jPM6__Dlc0feI.ttf
30 ms
xfuu0WDhWW_fOEoY8l_VPNZfB7jPM68qCVc0feI.ttf
46 ms
xfuu0WDhWW_fOEoY8l_VPNZfB7jPM68YCVc0feI.ttf
56 ms
xfuu0WDhWW_fOEoY8l_VPNZfB7jPM69GCVc0feI.ttf
57 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
56 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
57 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
54 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
54 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
73 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
72 ms
stls.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
stls.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
stls.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stls.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stls.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stls.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of St Ls. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: