3.8 sec in total
1.2 sec
1.9 sec
632 ms
Welcome to stltechtalk.com homepage info - get ready to check Stltechtalk best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about stltechtalk.com
The place in St. Louis to learn more about the world of mobile technology
Visit stltechtalk.comWe analyzed Stltechtalk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
stltechtalk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value3.5 s
64/100
25%
Value3.2 s
92/100
10%
Value170 ms
92/100
30%
Value0.099
90/100
15%
Value3.8 s
89/100
10%
1176 ms
123 ms
134 ms
193 ms
138 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Stltechtalk.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Stltechtalk.disqus.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Assets.pushup.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Stltechtalk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 386.4 kB (54%)
714.7 kB
328.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Stltechtalk.com main page is 714.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 272.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stltechtalk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 195.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 195.1 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 105.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stltechtalk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 105.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (61%)
31
12
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stltechtalk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stltechtalk.com
1176 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
123 ms
flick.css
134 ms
stltechtalk.com
193 ms
fontfaces.css
138 ms
style.css
153 ms
jquery.js
252 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
205 ms
scrollTo.js
206 ms
jquery.form.min.js
209 ms
mailchimp.js
223 ms
core.min.js
283 ms
datepicker.js
292 ms
style-frontpage.css
281 ms
style-mobile.css
282 ms
ajax.js
411 ms
frontend.js
411 ms
nivo.slider.min.js
409 ms
wp-embed.min.js
410 ms
pushup.min.js
363 ms
Twitter.png
331 ms
Facebook.png
332 ms
GooglePlus.png
331 ms
YouTube.png
329 ms
Mail.png
330 ms
STLTT_1200x150.png
335 ms
738x415_STLTechTalk_Podcast_featured_updated.png
337 ms
738x415_STLTechTalk_Podcast_featured_updated-250x150.png
332 ms
count.js
278 ms
loading.gif
268 ms
sourcesanspro-regular-webfont.woff
259 ms
sourcesanspro-light-webfont.woff
260 ms
sourcesanspro-extralight-webfont.woff
261 ms
sourcesanspro-semibold-webfont.woff
261 ms
sourcesanspro-bold-webfont.woff
259 ms
elusive.woff
261 ms
arrows.png
99 ms
count-data.js
49 ms
stltechtalk.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
stltechtalk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
stltechtalk.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stltechtalk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Stltechtalk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stltechtalk.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stltechtalk. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: