3.2 sec in total
254 ms
2.6 sec
305 ms
Visit stmatthew.fr now to see the best up-to-date St Matthew content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stmatthew.fr
Visit stmatthew.frWe analyzed Stmatthew.fr page load time and found that the first response time was 254 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
stmatthew.fr performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value3.5 s
64/100
25%
Value9.9 s
10/100
10%
Value9,090 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.061
98/100
15%
Value21.7 s
1/100
10%
254 ms
21 ms
429 ms
157 ms
158 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Stmatthew.fr, 5% (5 requests) were made to Bmsbn.ladesk.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Stmatthewfr.bms-incorp.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Stmatthewfr.bms-incorp.net.
Page size can be reduced by 229.1 kB (19%)
1.2 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Stmatthew.fr main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 935.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 138.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 138.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. St Matthew images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 89.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 89.1 kB or 66% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 71 (82%)
87
16
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of St Matthew. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stmatthew.fr
254 ms
analytics.js
21 ms
429 ms
settings.css
157 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
158 ms
woocommerce.css
160 ms
wpcc.css
164 ms
base.css
175 ms
layout.css
282 ms
shortcodes.css
240 ms
animations.min.css
239 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
238 ms
prettyPhoto.css
244 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
261 ms
responsive.css
320 ms
css
28 ms
js_composer.min.css
492 ms
font-awesome.min.css
318 ms
style.css
324 ms
Defaults.css
347 ms
woocommerce.css
375 ms
style.css
397 ms
genericons.css
488 ms
jetpack.css
407 ms
jquery.js
529 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
487 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
559 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
528 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
575 ms
wpcc.min.js
553 ms
advertising.js
575 ms
woocommerce-add-to-cart.js
576 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
54 ms
photon.js
544 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
599 ms
woocommerce.min.js
599 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
600 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
599 ms
core.min.js
599 ms
effect.min.js
630 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
3 ms
e-201611.js
3 ms
effect-shake.min.js
644 ms
widget.min.js
579 ms
mouse.min.js
579 ms
sortable.min.js
584 ms
tabs.min.js
592 ms
accordion.min.js
618 ms
plugins.js
724 ms
menu.js
565 ms
animations.min.js
571 ms
jplayer.min.js
584 ms
scripts.js
588 ms
comment-reply.min.js
597 ms
wp-embed.min.js
564 ms
sharing.js
571 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
474 ms
congress.png
167 ms
home_congress_members.jpg
279 ms
home_congress_slide1.jpg
664 ms
home_congress_post1.jpg
958 ms
home_congress_logo_footer.png
204 ms
home_congress_quote.png
352 ms
home_congress_divider_pattern.png
168 ms
home_congress_take_a_part_bg.jpg
1018 ms
home_congress_divider_pattern.png
499 ms
box_shadow_button.png
498 ms
track.js
856 ms
home_congress_list.png
173 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlBM0YzuT7MdOe03otPbuUS0.woff
31 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNbE_oMaV8t2eFeISPpzbdE.woff
44 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGFkQc6VGVFSmCnC_l7QZG60.woff
58 ms
M2Jd71oPJhLKp0zdtTvoMzNrcjQuD0pTu1za2FULaMs.woff
58 ms
Genericons.svg
440 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
18 ms
mfn-icons.woff
458 ms
revolution.extension.video.min.js
90 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
88 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
86 ms
revolution.extension.parallax.min.js
96 ms
stmatthew.fr
929 ms
share
90 ms
g.gif
12 ms
count.json
60 ms
graph.facebook.com
167 ms
g.gif
23 ms
g.gif
24 ms
box_shadow.png
95 ms
top_bar_right_shadow.png
105 ms
g.gif
21 ms
home_congress_take_a_part_bg.jpg
834 ms
track_visit.php
416 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
81 ms
bus.html
178 ms
postmessage.js
35 ms
pushstream.js
75 ms
stmatthew.fr accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
stmatthew.fr best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
stmatthew.fr SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stmatthew.fr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stmatthew.fr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stmatthew.fr
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of St Matthew. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: