Tools & Wizards About Us
stmwritingsolutions.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

stmwritingsolutions.com

Freelance Writer, Web Developer

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

319 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

102 ms

stmwritingsolutions.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to stmwritingsolutions.com homepage info - get ready to check Stmwritingsolutions best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about stmwritingsolutions.com

Freelance Writer specialising in Website Development & Social Media Management. Working with small business owners and Start-Ups.

Visit stmwritingsolutions.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stmwritingsolutions.com page load time and found that the first response time was 319 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stmwritingsolutions.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.6 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,460 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.9 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.stmwritingsolutions.com

319 ms

minified.js

44 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

82 ms

polyfill.min.js

82 ms

thunderbolt-commons.3a64b3ed.bundle.min.js

165 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Stmwritingsolutions.com, 36% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 30% (14 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (941 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (56%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

883.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Stmwritingsolutions.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 229.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 90.4 kB

  • Original 500.0 kB
  • After minification 409.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Stmwritingsolutions needs image optimization as it can save up to 90.4 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 48.7 kB

  • Original 293.5 kB
  • After minification 293.4 kB
  • After compression 244.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.7 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (24%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

31

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stmwritingsolutions. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.stmwritingsolutions.com

www.stmwritingsolutions.com

319 ms

minified.js

minified.js

44 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

82 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

82 ms

thunderbolt-commons.3a64b3ed.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.3a64b3ed.bundle.min.js

165 ms

main.380e55cc.bundle.min.js

main.380e55cc.bundle.min.js

165 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

166 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

175 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

175 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

175 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

191 ms

7138_STM%20Writing%20Solutions_logo_PR_S_01_.png

7138_STM%20Writing%20Solutions_logo_PR_S_01_.png

416 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

91 ms

Content%20Creation8.jpg

Content%20Creation8.jpg

570 ms

Content%20Creation33.jpg

Content%20Creation33.jpg

675 ms

7138_STM%20Writing%20Solutions_logo_PR_S_moc.jpg

7138_STM%20Writing%20Solutions_logo_PR_S_moc.jpg

723 ms

b9d52e_55898dcdaa5b4983b2e8f640a045a48b~mv2.jpg

b9d52e_55898dcdaa5b4983b2e8f640a045a48b~mv2.jpg

583 ms

a3c153_086ce2c5d9e346c087d359f9353745ca~mv2.png

a3c153_086ce2c5d9e346c087d359f9353745ca~mv2.png

519 ms

a3c153_8ed0b33c633b47aaaab19863590ae9e5~mv2.png

a3c153_8ed0b33c633b47aaaab19863590ae9e5~mv2.png

504 ms

11062b_29e8d020f8d242729fd05fd6d97cfe09~mv2.jpg

11062b_29e8d020f8d242729fd05fd6d97cfe09~mv2.jpg

664 ms

The%20Perfect%20Wave.png

The%20Perfect%20Wave.png

724 ms

8e29fc9caeac45eca7ba7756230db91b.jpg

8e29fc9caeac45eca7ba7756230db91b.jpg

695 ms

Akasha.png

Akasha.png

803 ms

b9d52e_7202a4df77324a4898498bdaed799a2d~mv2.webp

b9d52e_7202a4df77324a4898498bdaed799a2d~mv2.webp

862 ms

b9d52e_1ece16f0f96e4ba78e937cbebcace148~mv2.webp

b9d52e_1ece16f0f96e4ba78e937cbebcace148~mv2.webp

885 ms

b9d52e_a92687ae112c4189b408edbf7c625645~mv2.webp

b9d52e_a92687ae112c4189b408edbf7c625645~mv2.webp

941 ms

131 ms

125 ms

129 ms

127 ms

126 ms

137 ms

162 ms

160 ms

163 ms

160 ms

160 ms

169 ms

KGBfwabt0ZRLA5W1ywjowW_WCyVccUAWDspcx_4UXqg.woff

KGBfwabt0ZRLA5W1ywjowW_WCyVccUAWDspcx_4UXqg.woff

17 ms

DK0eTGXiZjN6yA8zAEyM2UtCETOCmz2wCdel46UOhAM.woff

DK0eTGXiZjN6yA8zAEyM2UtCETOCmz2wCdel46UOhAM.woff

16 ms

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

17 ms

AvenirLTW05-35Light.woff

AvenirLTW05-35Light.woff

16 ms

e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff

e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff

16 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

6 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

35 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

10 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

11 ms

Accessibility Review

stmwritingsolutions.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

stmwritingsolutions.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

stmwritingsolutions.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stmwritingsolutions.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stmwritingsolutions.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stmwritingsolutions.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stmwritingsolutions. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: