Tools & Wizards About Us
stockportfencing.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

stockportfencing.co.uk

Stockport Fencing Ltd. The official Stockport Fencing website

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

301 ms

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

317 ms

stockportfencing.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to stockportfencing.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Stockport Fencing best content right away, or after learning these important things about stockportfencing.co.uk

Stockport Fencing Ltd, the North West's premier fencing manufacturer and installers. Supplying and installing a vast range of fencing.

Visit stockportfencing.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Stockportfencing.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 301 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stockportfencing.co.uk performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

59/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stockportfencing.co.uk

301 ms

www.stockportfencing.co.uk

1089 ms

cart-summary.css

104 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

204 ms

woocommerce.css

495 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Stockportfencing.co.uk, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Stockportfencing.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.5 MB (84%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

471.6 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stockportfencing.co.uk main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 164.7 kB

  • Original 188.6 kB
  • After minification 187.1 kB
  • After compression 23.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 164.7 kB or 87% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 555.7 kB

  • Original 776.5 kB
  • After minification 776.5 kB
  • After compression 220.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 555.7 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 1.8 MB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB
  • After compression 227.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stockportfencing.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.8 MB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (94%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

4

  • AJAX
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stockport Fencing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

stockportfencing.co.uk

stockportfencing.co.uk

301 ms

www.stockportfencing.co.uk

www.stockportfencing.co.uk

1089 ms

cart-summary.css

cart-summary.css

104 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

woocommerce-layout.css

204 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

495 ms

gateway.css

gateway.css

299 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

305 ms

style.css

style.css

320 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

321 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

318 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

497 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

699 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

526 ms

post-12019.css

post-12019.css

423 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

940 ms

uael-frontend.min.css

uael-frontend.min.css

1139 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

689 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

598 ms

global.css

global.css

1041 ms

post-2917.css

post-2917.css

707 ms

post-2814.css

post-2814.css

790 ms

post-11478.css

post-11478.css

797 ms

checkout.css

checkout.css

801 ms

css

css

39 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

987 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

897 ms

pricing-table.css

pricing-table.css

902 ms

deals-table.css

deals-table.css

998 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1102 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1048 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

1088 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

1098 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

1205 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

1206 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

1207 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

1207 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

1207 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

1239 ms

js

js

77 ms

wc-blocks.css

wc-blocks.css

1307 ms

accounting.min.js

accounting.min.js

1118 ms

add-to-cart-variation.min.js

add-to-cart-variation.min.js

1023 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1018 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

1091 ms

pao-validation.min.js

pao-validation.min.js

1091 ms

addons.min.js

addons.min.js

1091 ms

button.js

button.js

1081 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

929 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

966 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

943 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

901 ms

cart-fragments.min.js

cart-fragments.min.js

822 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

856 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

867 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

813 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

805 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

812 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

743 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

764 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

721 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

713 ms

font

font

22 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

303 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

303 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

332 ms

686 ms

www.stockportfencing.co.uk

www.stockportfencing.co.uk

526 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

103 ms

Accessibility Review

stockportfencing.co.uk accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

stockportfencing.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

stockportfencing.co.uk SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stockportfencing.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stockportfencing.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stockportfencing.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stockport Fencing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: