Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

stona.com

Designer Modern Kitchen Washington DC, Bathroom Interiors

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

152 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

281 ms

stona.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to stona.com homepage info - get ready to check Stona best content right away, or after learning these important things about stona.com

Stona provides Kitchen, Bathroom, Interior and Tile Products as well unique interior design services as well as full design consultation and 3-D rendering.

Visit stona.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stona.com page load time and found that the first response time was 152 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stona.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value910 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.1

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.0 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stona.com

152 ms

analytics.js

9 ms

fY9RDoIwEEQvBCl8eQ2v0JQtNJYu2VlQbu-ammhM6vd7szM7uFT48BO7KH6lO8vNBcAt5CcSdEODY2HRwBO1lZjpgZzsTFPZhFTP68LKXw70zNTMWCQV_wdj44J0UDe6wEV90D6yrP3FEiHvNrl-8GqBSZ-dzgOk-F3fUurO0SqPNxT0W97nVCq351KZ8QQ.css

169 ms

M9QvL0jOSU3TTywuTi0p1k_JLC7RTy4u1s9NzMzTy83MAwA.css

167 ms

css

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Stona.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (741 ms) belongs to the original domain Stona.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 548.5 kB (29%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Stona.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 143.2 kB

  • Original 161.7 kB
  • After minification 157.1 kB
  • After compression 18.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 143.2 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 371.9 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 997.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Stona needs image optimization as it can save up to 371.9 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 32.9 kB

  • Original 318.4 kB
  • After minification 318.4 kB
  • After compression 285.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 462 B

  • Original 41.2 kB
  • After minification 41.2 kB
  • After compression 40.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stona.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (41%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

35

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stona. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

stona.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

stona.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

stona.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stona.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stona.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stona. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: