Tools & Wizards About Us
stona.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

stona.com

Designer Modern Kitchen Washington DC, Bathroom Interiors

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

164 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

84 ms

stona.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to stona.com homepage info - get ready to check Stona best content right away, or after learning these important things about stona.com

Stona provides Kitchen, Bathroom, Interior and Tile Products as well unique interior design services as well as full design consultation and 3-D rendering.

Visit stona.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stona.com page load time and found that the first response time was 164 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stona.com performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

73/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

55/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value370 ms

71/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.06

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.6 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stona.com

164 ms

analytics.js

7 ms

fY9RDoIwEEQvBCl8eQ2v0JQtNJYu2VlQbu-ammhM6vd7szM7uFT48BO7KH6lO8vNBcAt5CcSdEODY2HRwBO1lZjpgZzsTFPZhFTP68LKXw70zNTMWCQV_wdj44J0UDe6wEV90D6yrP3FEiHvNrl-8GqBSZ-dzgOk-F3fUurO0SqPNxT0W97nVCq351KZ8QQ.css

925 ms

M9QvL0jOSU3TTywuTi0p1k_JLC7RTy4u1s9NzMzTy83MAwA.css

931 ms

M9DPzMsvS0zJ108rSsxNLc8vytZPLi7WTy4tLsnPjS9OLsosKAEA.css

976 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Stona.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Stona.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 789.1 kB (39%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Stona.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 83.5 kB

  • Original 98.1 kB
  • After minification 93.5 kB
  • After compression 14.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 361.0 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 987.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Stona needs image optimization as it can save up to 361.0 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 344.6 kB

  • Original 560.6 kB
  • After minification 560.6 kB
  • After compression 216.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 344.6 kB or 61% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (23%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stona. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

stona.com

stona.com

164 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

7 ms

fY9RDoIwEEQvBCl8eQ2v0JQtNJYu2VlQbu-ammhM6vd7szM7uFT48BO7KH6lO8vNBcAt5CcSdEODY2HRwBO1lZjpgZzsTFPZhFTP68LKXw70zNTMWCQV_wdj44J0UDe6wEV90D6yrP3FEiHvNrl-8GqBSZ-dzgOk-F3fUurO0SqPNxT0W97nVCq351KZ8QQ.css

fY9RDoIwEEQvBCl8eQ2v0JQtNJYu2VlQbu-ammhM6vd7szM7uFT48BO7KH6lO8vNBcAt5CcSdEODY2HRwBO1lZjpgZzsTFPZhFTP68LKXw70zNTMWCQV_wdj44J0UDe6wEV90D6yrP3FEiHvNrl-8GqBSZ-dzgOk-F3fUurO0SqPNxT0W97nVCq351KZ8QQ.css

925 ms

M9QvL0jOSU3TTywuTi0p1k_JLC7RTy4u1s9NzMzTy83MAwA.css

M9QvL0jOSU3TTywuTi0p1k_JLC7RTy4u1s9NzMzTy83MAwA.css

931 ms

M9DPzMsvS0zJ108rSsxNLc8vytZPLi7WTy4tLsnPjS9OLsosKAEA.css

M9DPzMsvS0zJ108rSsxNLc8vytZPLi7WTy4tLsnPjS9OLsosKAEA.css

976 ms

css

css

24 ms

lYzBEsIgDER_CIpOv4iBlKYGggmg_n11hqMevO3svrerO-4d5GXWGWzGJL7BkrGYqxMYShhBnKit1BMWd-hkl7ZDhtpL2JfGTPqv9AaZekMu09QgTGRF1cIzgNT2pTIXh4WHj-w28RkeLLfPP3jFkn6tG7aBUU8.js

lYzBEsIgDER_CIpOv4iBlKYGggmg_n11hqMevO3svrerO-4d5GXWGWzGJL7BkrGYqxMYShhBnKit1BMWd-hkl7ZDhtpL2JfGTPqv9AaZekMu09QgTGRF1cIzgNT2pTIXh4WHj-w28RkeLLfPP3jFkn6tG7aBUU8.js

919 ms

js

js

50 ms

css

css

40 ms

M9FPzs_NTc0r0S1KLcip1MvNzNMxBIrllSQml-im5Rfl6prrZ-Yl55SmpBbrZwFRYWlqUaUeSAakGAA.js

M9FPzs_NTc0r0S1KLcip1MvNzNMxBIrllSQml-im5Rfl6prrZ-Yl55SmpBbrZwFRYWlqUaUeSAakGAA.js

935 ms

collect

collect

26 ms

js

js

62 ms

hc7BEoMgDATQH6qmnvo9iGGMAqFJqPXv63DpifG8b3Z3As_ZnLchsKThBZR9rAsqbArqhYrpY4IQ8auRFhRwqmgt3t4V5RwTV8VjRYxjonyD_1nDz2uPP25hCOISHix7G15ZzPN1oydmZlMTV7oVtaAE0rUHEs8UMWGuPXG4szBl01swqJHfz54LNXsjzvoD.js

hc7BEoMgDATQH6qmnvo9iGGMAqFJqPXv63DpifG8b3Z3As_ZnLchsKThBZR9rAsqbArqhYrpY4IQ8auRFhRwqmgt3t4V5RwTV8VjRYxjonyD_1nDz2uPP25hCOISHix7G15ZzPN1oydmZlMTV7oVtaAE0rUHEs8UMWGuPXG4szBl01swqJHfz54LNXsjzvoD.js

934 ms

M9DPzMsvS0zJ108rSsxNLc8vytbPKtYvKEotKakMyMgvyQcA.js

M9DPzMsvS0zJ108rSsxNLc8vytbPKtYvKEotKakMyMgvyQcA.js

1403 ms

M9DPzMsvS0zJ108rSsxNLc8vytbPKtYvKc8sKUkt0s8qLE0tqtQrKU9NLQEA.js

M9DPzMsvS0zJ108rSsxNLc8vytbPKtYvKc8sKUkt0s8qLE0tqtQrKU9NLQEA.js

1321 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

32 ms

collect

collect

34 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

75 ms

StonaLogo-300x78.png

StonaLogo-300x78.png

157 ms

Featured3.jpg

Featured3.jpg

256 ms

sloganTransparent.png

sloganTransparent.png

115 ms

Featured4.jpg

Featured4.jpg

169 ms

Hauptressort_940x430.jpg

Hauptressort_940x430.jpg

363 ms

TILES_FEAT.png

TILES_FEAT.png

373 ms

BATHFEAT.png

BATHFEAT.png

325 ms

KITCHENFEAT.png

KITCHENFEAT.png

411 ms

PROJECTSFEAT.png

PROJECTSFEAT.png

432 ms

Brands_Featured1.png

Brands_Featured1.png

420 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

429 ms

Facebook.png

Facebook.png

475 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

476 ms

googleplus.png

googleplus.png

486 ms

instagram.png

instagram.png

495 ms

TL105231-60x60.jpg

TL105231-60x60.jpg

497 ms

WNB00001-21-60x60.jpg

WNB00001-21-60x60.jpg

531 ms

WNB0007311-60x60.jpg

WNB0007311-60x60.jpg

532 ms

decori_mini_lux_parete-8358-60x60.jpg

decori_mini_lux_parete-8358-60x60.jpg

543 ms

tile_20x60-07-e14376815833931-60x60.jpg

tile_20x60-07-e14376815833931-60x60.jpg

550 ms

23347-014-60x60.jpg

23347-014-60x60.jpg

557 ms

28014-010-60x60.jpg

28014-010-60x60.jpg

591 ms

28026-013-60x60.jpg

28026-013-60x60.jpg

587 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

13 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

13 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5WZNCzc.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5WZNCzc.ttf

14 ms

embed

embed

218 ms

js

js

27 ms

search.js

search.js

3 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

7 ms

main.js

main.js

11 ms

38 ms

15 ms

Accessibility Review

stona.com accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

stona.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

stona.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stona.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stona.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stona.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stona. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: