Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    43% of websites

stoneandstrand.com

STONE AND STRAND - Fine Jewelry For Every Little And Big Win

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

81 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

505 ms

stoneandstrand.com screenshot

About Website

Visit stoneandstrand.com now to see the best up-to-date STONE AND STRAND content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stoneandstrand.com

Amazing, beautiful dainty little things. Solid gold pieces with conflict-free, ethically-sourced diamonds and natural gemstones. Shop stacking rings, layering necklaces, diamond earrings, hoop earring...

Visit stoneandstrand.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stoneandstrand.com page load time and found that the first response time was 81 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stoneandstrand.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value24.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,830 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.078

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stoneandstrand.com

81 ms

www.stoneandstrand.com

684 ms

ld.js

152 ms

fbevents.js

122 ms

css_lQaZfjVpwP_oGNqdtWCSpJT1EMqXdMiU84ekLLxQnc4.css

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 149 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (132 requests) were addressed to the original Stoneandstrand.com, 2% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (700 ms) belongs to the original domain Stoneandstrand.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (22%)

Content Size

5.3 MB

After Optimization

4.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Stoneandstrand.com main page is 5.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 86.1 kB

  • Original 104.7 kB
  • After minification 101.8 kB
  • After compression 18.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 137.7 kB

  • Original 3.9 MB
  • After minification 3.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. STONE AND STRAND images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 565.5 kB

  • Original 805.7 kB
  • After minification 587.3 kB
  • After compression 240.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 565.5 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 362.7 kB

  • Original 429.1 kB
  • After minification 422.6 kB
  • After compression 66.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stoneandstrand.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 362.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 86 (60%)

Requests Now

144

After Optimization

58

The browser has sent 144 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of STONE AND STRAND. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 84 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

stoneandstrand.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

stoneandstrand.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

stoneandstrand.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stoneandstrand.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stoneandstrand.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of STONE AND STRAND. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: