Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

stonebridgecrossing.net

Cordova Apartments for Rent | Stonebridge Crossing Apartments

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

76 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

933 ms

stonebridgecrossing.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Stonebridge Crossing content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stonebridgecrossing.net

Looking for Cordova apartments for rent? Stonebridge Crossing Apartment Homes offer the location, floor plans, and amenities you desire. Contact us today!

Visit stonebridgecrossing.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Stonebridgecrossing.net page load time and found that the first response time was 76 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stonebridgecrossing.net performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.3 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,790 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.027

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

Stonebridge-Crossing

76 ms

osano.js

85 ms

i18n.min.js

221 ms

entrata-ui.min.js

191 ms

js

145 ms

Our browser made a total of 171 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Stonebridgecrossing.net, 8% (14 requests) were made to Static-ui-public.reputation.com and 8% (13 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (806 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.irtliving.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 663.9 kB (11%)

Content Size

6.1 MB

After Optimization

5.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Stonebridgecrossing.net main page is 6.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 281.5 kB

  • Original 325.5 kB
  • After minification 270.9 kB
  • After compression 44.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 54.7 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 281.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 279.4 kB

  • Original 5.0 MB
  • After minification 4.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stonebridge Crossing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 79.7 kB

  • Original 724.1 kB
  • After minification 721.1 kB
  • After compression 644.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 79.7 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 23.3 kB

  • Original 65.2 kB
  • After minification 65.2 kB
  • After compression 41.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stonebridgecrossing.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.3 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (44%)

Requests Now

151

After Optimization

85

The browser has sent 151 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stonebridge Crossing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 56 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

stonebridgecrossing.net accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

SEO Factors

stonebridgecrossing.net SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stonebridgecrossing.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stonebridgecrossing.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stonebridge Crossing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: