Tools & Wizards About Us
stoneclinic.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

stoneclinic.com

The Stone Clinic: World-Class Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

64 ms

Resources Loaded

561 ms

Page Rendered

459 ms

stoneclinic.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Stone Clinic content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stoneclinic.com

World-renowned orthopedic surgeon, Kevin R. Stone, MD uses a biologic approach to treat knee, shoulder, & ankle injuries and arthritis in San Francisco, CA.

Visit stoneclinic.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stoneclinic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 64 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stoneclinic.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

80/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value690 ms

43/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.023

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.7 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.stoneclinic.com

64 ms

api.min.js

148 ms

t.js

128 ms

css_yGFOBwxBoZq8zb1XClJv9cZHggHDbJ0T95QkL_IAgME.css

13 ms

css_YPDxqivtZZmWzavN_rTJzV5dWoOdcuzqHIwJYBWmBNI.css

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Stoneclinic.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (182 ms) relates to the external source Static.addtoany.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 111.6 kB (17%)

Content Size

675.4 kB

After Optimization

563.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stoneclinic.com main page is 675.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 394.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 54.5 kB

  • Original 67.2 kB
  • After minification 56.4 kB
  • After compression 12.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.9 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 27.4 kB

  • Original 394.6 kB
  • After minification 367.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stone Clinic images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 134.6 kB
  • After minification 134.6 kB
  • After compression 124.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 19.1 kB

  • Original 78.9 kB
  • After minification 78.9 kB
  • After compression 59.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stoneclinic.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.1 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (36%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stone Clinic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.stoneclinic.com

www.stoneclinic.com

64 ms

api.min.js

api.min.js

148 ms

t.js

t.js

128 ms

css_yGFOBwxBoZq8zb1XClJv9cZHggHDbJ0T95QkL_IAgME.css

css_yGFOBwxBoZq8zb1XClJv9cZHggHDbJ0T95QkL_IAgME.css

13 ms

css_YPDxqivtZZmWzavN_rTJzV5dWoOdcuzqHIwJYBWmBNI.css

css_YPDxqivtZZmWzavN_rTJzV5dWoOdcuzqHIwJYBWmBNI.css

31 ms

js_r9fOY_TVMSLq_MPzNmag2vcH8gy7xFDYmtxZ7vpyjcw.js

js_r9fOY_TVMSLq_MPzNmag2vcH8gy7xFDYmtxZ7vpyjcw.js

20 ms

page.js

page.js

182 ms

js_QzabKdpODS6kQWpMDX4XXPko4arzXc-dw_3l6FAfdVA.js

js_QzabKdpODS6kQWpMDX4XXPko4arzXc-dw_3l6FAfdVA.js

106 ms

js

js

151 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

110 ms

slogan.png

slogan.png

108 ms

Kkp8pcE5LBU.jpg

Kkp8pcE5LBU.jpg

110 ms

01_0.jpg

01_0.jpg

108 ms

02_0.jpg

02_0.jpg

110 ms

Richard-Running-Forrest-Gump-Hwy-3.jpg

Richard-Running-Forrest-Gump-Hwy-3.jpg

115 ms

play_forever-twitter-available_now.jpg

play_forever-twitter-available_now.jpg

117 ms

Well-Leg-Bycling%20%281%29.jpg

Well-Leg-Bycling%20%281%29.jpg

115 ms

Richard-Running-Forrest-Gump-Hwy-3%20%281%29.jpg

Richard-Running-Forrest-Gump-Hwy-3%20%281%29.jpg

115 ms

DL0_gcP15Ts.jpg

DL0_gcP15Ts.jpg

115 ms

search.svg

search.svg

26 ms

headphones.svg

headphones.svg

28 ms

phone.svg

phone.svg

41 ms

HelveticaNeue-Bold.woff

HelveticaNeue-Bold.woff

27 ms

HelveticaNeue-Black.woff

HelveticaNeue-Black.woff

43 ms

HelveticaNeue-Heavy.woff

HelveticaNeue-Heavy.woff

42 ms

HelveticaNeue-Medium.woff

HelveticaNeue-Medium.woff

58 ms

HelveticaNeue-Roman.woff

HelveticaNeue-Roman.woff

44 ms

HelveticaNeue-Light.woff

HelveticaNeue-Light.woff

44 ms

HelveticaNeue-UltraLight.woff

HelveticaNeue-UltraLight.woff

137 ms

HelveticaNeue-Thin.woff

HelveticaNeue-Thin.woff

57 ms

HelveticaNeue-Italic.woff

HelveticaNeue-Italic.woff

44 ms

HelveticaNeue-MediumItalic.woff

HelveticaNeue-MediumItalic.woff

85 ms

HelveticaNeue-LightItalic.woff

HelveticaNeue-LightItalic.woff

84 ms

HelveticaNeue-UltraLightItalic.woff

HelveticaNeue-UltraLightItalic.woff

86 ms

HelveticaNeue-ThinItalic.woff

HelveticaNeue-ThinItalic.woff

88 ms

HelveticaNeue-BoldItalic.woff

HelveticaNeue-BoldItalic.woff

85 ms

HelveticaNeue-BlackItalic.woff

HelveticaNeue-BlackItalic.woff

85 ms

HelveticaNeue-HeavyItalic.woff

HelveticaNeue-HeavyItalic.woff

134 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

74 ms

js

js

75 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

70 ms

sm.25.html

sm.25.html

58 ms

eso.BRQnzO8v.js

eso.BRQnzO8v.js

176 ms

destination

destination

128 ms

collect

collect

51 ms

stone-icons.ttf

stone-icons.ttf

37 ms

Accessibility Review

stoneclinic.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

stoneclinic.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

stoneclinic.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stoneclinic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stoneclinic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stoneclinic.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stone Clinic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: