Tools & Wizards About Us
stonefieldcastlehotel.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

stonefieldcastlehotel.com

Save big on your hotel. Book Now! - Reservations.com

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

50 ms

Resources Loaded

846 ms

Page Rendered

267 ms

stonefieldcastlehotel.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Stonefieldcastle Hotel content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stonefieldcastlehotel.com

Enjoy up to 60% off on all hotel bookings for top destinations only at Reservations.com. Make your hotel reservations now to save more.

Visit stonefieldcastlehotel.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stonefieldcastlehotel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 50 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stonefieldcastlehotel.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value24.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.6 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,030 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value27.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stonefieldcastlehotel.com

50 ms

www.reservations.com

103 ms

uc.js

49 ms

7582c846e35df66ffbe22f465416b514.js

54 ms

css

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Stonefieldcastlehotel.com, 64% (47 requests) were made to Reservations.com and 12% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (347 ms) relates to the external source Reservations.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 181.1 kB (11%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stonefieldcastlehotel.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 995.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 80.3 kB

  • Original 104.0 kB
  • After minification 104.0 kB
  • After compression 23.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 995.1 kB
  • After minification 995.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stonefieldcastle Hotel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 99.5 kB

  • Original 370.2 kB
  • After minification 370.2 kB
  • After compression 270.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 99.5 kB or 27% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 137.5 kB
  • After minification 137.5 kB
  • After compression 136.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stonefieldcastlehotel.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (90%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stonefieldcastle Hotel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

stonefieldcastlehotel.com

stonefieldcastlehotel.com

50 ms

www.reservations.com

www.reservations.com

103 ms

uc.js

uc.js

49 ms

7582c846e35df66ffbe22f465416b514.js

7582c846e35df66ffbe22f465416b514.js

54 ms

css

css

54 ms

css

css

83 ms

css

css

85 ms

css2

css2

98 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

35 ms

daterangepicker.css

daterangepicker.css

45 ms

messagePopper.css

messagePopper.css

41 ms

home-style.css

home-style.css

58 ms

register-style.css

register-style.css

70 ms

dark.css

dark.css

41 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

53 ms

font-icons.css

font-icons.css

68 ms

animate.css

animate.css

78 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

83 ms

home-responsive.css

home-responsive.css

80 ms

colors.css

colors.css

89 ms

custom.css

custom.css

87 ms

component.css

component.css

83 ms

coupon.css

coupon.css

111 ms

RcomMediaCore.js

RcomMediaCore.js

83 ms

Rcom.Web.Media.ClickTripz.js

Rcom.Web.Media.ClickTripz.js

86 ms

48 ms

spinner.css

spinner.css

96 ms

index.css

index.css

104 ms

mobile-daterangepicker.css

mobile-daterangepicker.css

141 ms

destination-list.css

destination-list.css

104 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

90 ms

settings.min.js

settings.min.js

104 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

41 ms

jquery-migrate-3.3.2.min.js

jquery-migrate-3.3.2.min.js

45 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

179 ms

jquery.creditCardValidator.js

jquery.creditCardValidator.js

183 ms

querystring.js

querystring.js

183 ms

home-plugins.js

home-plugins.js

190 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

184 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

184 ms

functions.js

functions.js

184 ms

daterangepicker.min.js

daterangepicker.min.js

185 ms

ssm.min.js

ssm.min.js

185 ms

ResponsiveMode.js

ResponsiveMode.js

347 ms

delay.js

delay.js

346 ms

7bc7c81632.js

7bc7c81632.js

47 ms

phone.js

phone.js

346 ms

js

js

62 ms

17164.js

17164.js

39 ms

daterangepicker_setting.js

daterangepicker_setting.js

346 ms

index.js

index.js

314 ms

Google.min.js

Google.min.js

346 ms

GooglePlaceApi.min.js

GooglePlaceApi.min.js

343 ms

prum.min.js

prum.min.js

284 ms

logo-r.png

logo-r.png

247 ms

logo.png

logo.png

247 ms

1600x600@1x.jpg

1600x600@1x.jpg

288 ms

splash4.jpg

splash4.jpg

248 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

265 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

278 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

279 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff

111 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff

111 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff

112 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrc.woff

110 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrc.woff

111 ms

font-icons.woff

font-icons.woff

67 ms

lined-icons.woff

lined-icons.woff

66 ms

Simple-Line-Icons.woff

Simple-Line-Icons.woff

96 ms

55xqey1sJNPjPiv1ZZZrxK1-4b_oKA.woff

55xqey1sJNPjPiv1ZZZrxK1-4b_oKA.woff

137 ms

7bc7c81632.css

7bc7c81632.css

74 ms

font-awesome-css.min.css

font-awesome-css.min.css

23 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

88 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

50 ms

Accessibility Review

stonefieldcastlehotel.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

stonefieldcastlehotel.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

stonefieldcastlehotel.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stonefieldcastlehotel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stonefieldcastlehotel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stonefieldcastlehotel.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stonefieldcastle Hotel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: