4 sec in total
535 ms
3.1 sec
344 ms
Visit stonefly.com now to see the best up-to-date Stone Fly content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stonefly.com
Advanced cost-effective full featured SAN, NAS hyper-converged, Cloud solutions backup, and DR services by the innovator of iSCSI technology.
Visit stonefly.comWe analyzed Stonefly.com page load time and found that the first response time was 535 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
stonefly.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
80/100
10%
Value3.8 s
56/100
25%
Value4.3 s
76/100
10%
Value3,050 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value6.6 s
57/100
10%
535 ms
386 ms
308 ms
33 ms
234 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Stonefly.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Pi.pardot.com.
Page size can be reduced by 251.9 kB (12%)
2.1 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Stonefly.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 84.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stone Fly images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 105.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 105.1 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stonefly.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (28%)
43
31
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stone Fly. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
stonefly.com
535 ms
jquery-1.2.6.pack.js
386 ms
videos-scroll.js
308 ms
jquery.min.js
33 ms
dropdown-menus.js
234 ms
mobile-menus.js
234 ms
mobile-scroll-up.js
159 ms
style.css
305 ms
jwplayer.js
466 ms
add2home.css
310 ms
add2home.js
416 ms
slide-customers.js
310 ms
pi.js
171 ms
ga.js
28 ms
__utm.gif
19 ms
sfy-bg.jpg
928 ms
icon-facebook.png
81 ms
icon-twitter.png
79 ms
icon-youtube.png
79 ms
icon-linkedin.png
81 ms
icon-google.png
80 ms
stonefly-logo.gif
82 ms
home-products-off.png
168 ms
home-company-off.png
174 ms
home-support-off.png
172 ms
msc-circle.jpg
250 ms
aboutsf-circle.gif
173 ms
education-circle.jpg
171 ms
banner-home.jpg
1799 ms
analytics
2242 ms
1828.js
73 ms
1.png
463 ms
2.png
312 ms
3.png
312 ms
4.png
467 ms
5.png
468 ms
6.png
469 ms
7.png
623 ms
8.png
548 ms
9.png
550 ms
10.png
550 ms
11.png
626 ms
12.png
631 ms
13.png
631 ms
stonefly.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes are not valid or misspelled
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
stonefly.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
stonefly.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stonefly.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stonefly.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
stonefly.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stone Fly. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: