1.2 sec in total
140 ms
994 ms
63 ms
Click here to check amazing Stonegate content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stonegate.com
Stonegate provides data solutions, licensed software products, and market intelligence to help our clients better acquire and retain their customers.
Visit stonegate.comWe analyzed Stonegate.com page load time and found that the first response time was 140 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
stonegate.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
76/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value690 ms
43/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value12.6 s
14/100
10%
140 ms
35 ms
32 ms
34 ms
114 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Stonegate.com, 32% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com and 14% (5 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (478 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 469.7 kB (52%)
896.8 kB
427.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Stonegate.com main page is 896.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 594.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 464.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 464.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stonegate images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (52%)
21
10
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stonegate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.stonegateadvisors.com
140 ms
minified.js
35 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
32 ms
polyfill.min.js
34 ms
thunderbolt-commons.40a6e213.bundle.min.js
114 ms
main.bb6950a6.bundle.min.js
147 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
146 ms
lodash.min.js
119 ms
react.production.min.js
132 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
119 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
147 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
147 ms
54ff4b_23d811c56e2f4caeb11c501091cfe784~mv2.png
315 ms
bundle.min.js
58 ms
05e3dc_d76e10ffc7334f30944ded411e5c7418.jpg
370 ms
54ff4b_c7a00a83ede94a9285fd138a970f157f~mv2_d_2809_1578_s_2.png
478 ms
STAMP%20Logo%20With%20TM.png
450 ms
a1a5c46effc243fba60aac7493349d62.jpg
420 ms
101 ms
100 ms
102 ms
98 ms
99 ms
97 ms
133 ms
132 ms
134 ms
132 ms
132 ms
128 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
6 ms
bolt-performance
23 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
4 ms
right-arrow.svg
19 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
4 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
5 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
4 ms
stonegate.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
stonegate.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
stonegate.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stonegate.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stonegate.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stonegate.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stonegate. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: