3.5 sec in total
552 ms
2.7 sec
227 ms
Visit stonehenge.fr now to see the best up-to-date Stoneh En Ge content for France and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stonehenge.fr
Tirez les meilleurs profits de votre informatique en temps partagé. Gestion du parc, réseau, produits Microsoft, logiciels de gestion, formation.
Visit stonehenge.frWe analyzed Stonehenge.fr page load time and found that the first response time was 552 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
stonehenge.fr performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.3 s
0/100
10%
Value9.3 s
1/100
25%
Value18.5 s
0/100
10%
Value190 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.028
100/100
15%
Value14.1 s
10/100
10%
552 ms
66 ms
515 ms
700 ms
682 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Stonehenge.fr, 12% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Stonehenge.fr.
Page size can be reduced by 44.6 kB (14%)
328.3 kB
283.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Stonehenge.fr main page is 328.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 170.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stonehenge.fr has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (91%)
54
5
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stoneh En Ge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stonehenge.fr
552 ms
analytics.js
66 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
515 ms
frontend.min.css
700 ms
post-211.css
682 ms
style.min.css
696 ms
eae.min.css
785 ms
vegas.min.css
694 ms
styles.css
709 ms
all.min.css
771 ms
v4-shims.min.css
805 ms
cbfg2111573674380.min.css
807 ms
css
137 ms
bootstrap.css
817 ms
style.css
823 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
862 ms
animations.min.css
874 ms
frontend.min.css
968 ms
typing-effect.min.css
875 ms
font-awesome.min.css
882 ms
global.css
885 ms
css
96 ms
frontend.min.js
931 ms
jquery.js
1050 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1005 ms
v4-shims.min.js
1009 ms
eae.min.js
1010 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1016 ms
masonry.min.js
1251 ms
animated-main.min.js
1168 ms
particles.min.js
1254 ms
magnific.min.js
1253 ms
vegas.min.js
1261 ms
swiper.min.js
1267 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
1266 ms
tilt.jquery.min.js
1267 ms
scripts.js
1268 ms
cbfg2111573674380.min.js
1268 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1268 ms
customscript.js
1269 ms
collect
57 ms
collect
66 ms
wp-embed.min.js
771 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
624 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
611 ms
frontend.min.js
797 ms
position.min.js
607 ms
dialog.min.js
658 ms
waypoints.min.js
593 ms
swiper.min.js
575 ms
frontend.min.js
562 ms
float.ls
584 ms
maps
388 ms
ieVl2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-19y7CA.ttf
384 ms
ieVi2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-33mZGCoYag.ttf
386 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
403 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
414 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
414 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
412 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
413 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
413 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
187 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
340 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
333 ms
frontend-msie.min.css
193 ms
embed
390 ms
js
26 ms
stonehenge.fr accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
stonehenge.fr best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
stonehenge.fr SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stonehenge.fr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stonehenge.fr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stonehenge.fr
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: