7.6 sec in total
35 ms
1.5 sec
6 sec
Visit stonehog.com now to see the best up-to-date Stonehog content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stonehog.com
Posts on bikes
Visit stonehog.comWe analyzed Stonehog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 35 ms and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
stonehog.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
67/100
10%
Value3.3 s
70/100
25%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.115
86/100
15%
Value3.9 s
88/100
10%
35 ms
209 ms
193 ms
181 ms
180 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Stonehog.com, 19% (11 requests) were made to Stonehog.files.wordpress.com and 18% (10 requests) were made to Live.staticflickr.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Stonehog.files.wordpress.com.
Page size can be reduced by 89.4 kB (0%)
30.3 MB
30.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Stonehog.com main page is 30.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 30.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 85.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stonehog images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 276 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stonehog.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (46%)
54
29
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stonehog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stonehog.com
35 ms
stonehog.com
209 ms
webfont.js
193 ms
style.css
181 ms
180 ms
184 ms
190 ms
198 ms
global.css
196 ms
201 ms
s2.wp.com
196 ms
hovercards.min.js
194 ms
wpgroho.js
198 ms
197 ms
jetpack-carousel.min.js
193 ms
rating.js
401 ms
carousel-wpcom.js
196 ms
w.js
197 ms
bilmur.min.js
115 ms
css
39 ms
global-print.css
11 ms
ga.js
132 ms
cropped-tape-3-2.jpg
177 ms
46788244764_f6252ddb24_s.jpg
159 ms
ab48b988881e9bf6c0b1eceff97a620a807fd971de973912bc044c9841f17440
235 ms
2ad0fad4-5f52-4227-93f5-8ddd9c96a03b_1_201_a.jpeg
699 ms
6c988784-d727-428b-9139-a2bd078b11ab_1_201_a.jpeg
678 ms
5014cffb-d973-4924-80d2-0da6828fc59a_1_100_o.jpeg
789 ms
432f01e7-7fc6-4fca-8390-d32cc398a3cb_1_201_a.jpeg
1020 ms
img_2614.jpg
314 ms
img_2622.jpg
366 ms
img_2627.jpg
488 ms
img_2633.jpg
491 ms
img_2634.jpg
606 ms
img_2636.jpg
585 ms
46788244514_c92853b794_s.jpg
164 ms
33635430748_7df1791656_s.jpg
225 ms
32569842257_dee7fea4b2_s.jpg
233 ms
33635430088_424e72ac8e_s.jpg
243 ms
47512098591_203a222a10_s.jpg
260 ms
40546105633_36645fcaab_s.jpg
261 ms
40546105283_5eb954c2f3_s.jpg
255 ms
33635428248_60ccc2bee0_s.jpg
260 ms
40546104673_1e1ca50292_s.jpg
262 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf
101 ms
__utm.gif
32 ms
rate.php
104 ms
rate.php
181 ms
rate.php
219 ms
rate.php
237 ms
rate.php
242 ms
g.gif
112 ms
remote-login.php
150 ms
g.gif
108 ms
g.gif
108 ms
actionbar.css
10 ms
actionbar.js
9 ms
stonehog.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
stonehog.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
stonehog.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stonehog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stonehog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stonehog.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stonehog. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: