5.8 sec in total
1.2 sec
4.2 sec
464 ms
Click here to check amazing Stonepack content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stonepack.co.uk
Stonepack Aggregates & Renderers are the Leading suppliers of multifunctional renders, dry dashing spars, decorative gravels to the landscaping industry.
Visit stonepack.co.ukWe analyzed Stonepack.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
stonepack.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
4/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value9.7 s
10/100
10%
Value2,360 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.373
28/100
15%
Value15.1 s
7/100
10%
1161 ms
57 ms
56 ms
104 ms
117 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Stonepack.co.uk, 7% (5 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Stonepack.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 157.4 kB (5%)
3.5 MB
3.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Stonepack.co.uk main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stonepack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 41.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stonepack.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (64%)
58
21
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stonepack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.stonepack.co.uk
1161 ms
font-awesome.min.css
57 ms
css
56 ms
js
104 ms
dhj7kty.js
117 ms
jquery.min.js
51 ms
ayecode-ui-compatibility.css
180 ms
style.min.css
255 ms
style.min.css
251 ms
main.css
347 ms
all.css
156 ms
jquery.min.js
347 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
266 ms
select2.min.js
271 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
415 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
497 ms
index.js
389 ms
jquery.form.min.js
388 ms
scripts.min.js
497 ms
payment-forms.js
498 ms
api.js
70 ms
index.js
496 ms
main.js
497 ms
wp-embed.min.js
529 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
530 ms
slick.min.js
531 ms
mtc_picturefill.js
530 ms
cookiecontrol.js
531 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
382 ms
analytics.js
107 ms
stonepack-logo.png
161 ms
Harvest-gold-wet1-1.jpg
239 ms
Harvest-gold-wet11.jpg
332 ms
Side-elevation-fotheringham-640x640.jpg
167 ms
Crannog-640x640.jpg
328 ms
Stonepack-Draft-Blocks-v2.jpg
167 ms
footer-bg.png
479 ms
case1-2-550x250.png
484 ms
house-550x250.jpg
328 ms
ury2-550x250.jpg
332 ms
111678043_l-640x640.jpg
489 ms
37004198_l-640x640.jpg
506 ms
iso9001.jpg
408 ms
wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js
322 ms
wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js
405 ms
wp-polyfill-url.min.js
407 ms
wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js
483 ms
wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js
481 ms
wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js
493 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
38 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
39 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
51 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
60 ms
fa-v4compatibility.ttf
61 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
91 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
240 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
240 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
26 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787z5vBJBkqg.ttf
118 ms
collect
28 ms
js
100 ms
recaptcha__en.js
183 ms
v
487 ms
sp-slider-01.jpg
307 ms
sp-slider-02.jpg
385 ms
sp-slider-03.jpg
1101 ms
d
67 ms
d
74 ms
d
75 ms
flexslider-icon.woff
112 ms
p.gif
38 ms
ga.js
14 ms
cc7.woff
88 ms
__utm.gif
37 ms
stonepack.co.uk accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
stonepack.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
stonepack.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stonepack.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stonepack.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stonepack.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stonepack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: