4 sec in total
732 ms
2.7 sec
521 ms
Click here to check amazing Stonepack content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stonepack.co.uk
Stonepack Aggregates & Renderers are the Leading suppliers of multifunctional renders, dry dashing spars, decorative gravels to the landscaping industry.
Visit stonepack.co.ukWe analyzed Stonepack.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 732 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
stonepack.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
5/100
10%
Value8.0 s
3/100
25%
Value7.8 s
24/100
10%
Value2,330 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.365
29/100
15%
Value15.0 s
7/100
10%
732 ms
58 ms
61 ms
122 ms
106 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Stonepack.co.uk, 7% (5 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (732 ms) belongs to the original domain Stonepack.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 122.8 kB (4%)
3.5 MB
3.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Stonepack.co.uk main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 58.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.1 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stonepack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 17.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stonepack.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (64%)
56
20
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stonepack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.stonepack.co.uk
732 ms
font-awesome.min.css
58 ms
css
61 ms
js
122 ms
dhj7kty.js
106 ms
jquery.min.js
51 ms
style.min.css
87 ms
style.min.css
173 ms
ayecode-ui-compatibility.css
446 ms
main.css
338 ms
all.css
69 ms
jquery.min.js
333 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
249 ms
select2.min.js
346 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
347 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
418 ms
index.js
422 ms
jquery.form.min.js
422 ms
scripts.min.js
427 ms
payment-forms.js
426 ms
api.js
62 ms
index.js
579 ms
main.js
580 ms
wp-embed.min.js
579 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
580 ms
slick.min.js
579 ms
mtc_picturefill.js
608 ms
cookiecontrol.js
609 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
459 ms
analytics.js
107 ms
stonepack-logo.png
153 ms
Harvest-gold-wet1-1.jpg
229 ms
Harvest-gold-wet11.jpg
153 ms
Side-elevation-fotheringham-640x640.jpg
153 ms
Crannog-640x640.jpg
227 ms
Stonepack-Draft-Blocks-v2.jpg
161 ms
footer-bg.png
462 ms
case1-2-550x250.png
382 ms
house-550x250.jpg
227 ms
ury2-550x250.jpg
234 ms
111678043_l-640x640.jpg
392 ms
37004198_l-640x640.jpg
460 ms
iso9001.jpg
319 ms
wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js
236 ms
wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js
324 ms
wp-polyfill-url.min.js
334 ms
wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js
388 ms
wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js
393 ms
wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js
409 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
41 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
43 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
58 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
69 ms
fa-v4compatibility.ttf
22 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
53 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
57 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
66 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
27 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787z5vBJBkqg.ttf
78 ms
collect
22 ms
js
80 ms
recaptcha__en.js
212 ms
v
556 ms
sp-slider-01.jpg
335 ms
sp-slider-02.jpg
423 ms
sp-slider-03.jpg
490 ms
d
99 ms
d
112 ms
d
110 ms
flexslider-icon.woff
122 ms
p.gif
24 ms
stonepack.co.uk accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
stonepack.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
stonepack.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stonepack.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stonepack.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stonepack.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stonepack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: