3 sec in total
408 ms
2.2 sec
327 ms
Visit stonewater.org now to see the best up-to-date Stonewater content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stonewater.org
Stonewater is one of the largest social housing providers in the UK, owning and managing around 39,000 homes for more than 82,000 customers.
Visit stonewater.orgWe analyzed Stonewater.org page load time and found that the first response time was 408 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
stonewater.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
22/100
10%
Value8.5 s
1/100
25%
Value7.1 s
31/100
10%
Value270 ms
82/100
30%
Value0.156
74/100
15%
Value10.8 s
22/100
10%
408 ms
263 ms
445 ms
64 ms
66 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Stonewater.org, 33% (18 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (702 ms) belongs to the original domain Stonewater.org.
Page size can be reduced by 438.4 kB (40%)
1.1 MB
650.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Stonewater.org main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 500.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 76.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Stonewater needs image optimization as it can save up to 76.0 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 158.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 158.8 kB or 47% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 176.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stonewater.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 176.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (73%)
48
13
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stonewater. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stonewater.org
408 ms
www.stonewater.org
263 ms
www.stonewater.org
445 ms
normalize.min.css
64 ms
foundation.min.css
66 ms
font-awesome.min.css
60 ms
site.min.css
86 ms
5bf69f00-4969-41a5-8ef8-912ea5679ab6.css
142 ms
modernizr.min.js
60 ms
jquery.min.js
103 ms
fastclick.min.js
73 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
71 ms
foundation.min.js
62 ms
foundation.topbar.min.js
71 ms
foundation.tooltip.min.js
376 ms
foundation.offcanvas.min.js
76 ms
foundation.reveal.min.js
71 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
69 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
69 ms
additional-methods.min.js
70 ms
jquery.address.min.js
69 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
68 ms
element.js
105 ms
site.min.js
160 ms
webfont.js
222 ms
gtm.js
276 ms
stonewater-logo.jpg
220 ms
asset_arrow282E31.png
196 ms
search.jpg
196 ms
hero-title-background.png
400 ms
hpp_1.jpg
429 ms
hpp_8.jpg
520 ms
hpp_5.jpg
520 ms
uc_web_web_banner.jpg
702 ms
hpp_3.jpg
519 ms
hpp_6.jpg
521 ms
blue-next.png
524 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
120 ms
4bf0ead4-e61b-4992-832b-6ff05828d99f.woff
107 ms
translateelement.css
150 ms
main.js
313 ms
css
142 ms
analytics.js
240 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
153 ms
prev.png
171 ms
next.png
169 ms
ajax-loader.gif
169 ms
hp_photo_06.jpg
407 ms
element_main.js
64 ms
collect
12 ms
collect
127 ms
translate_24dp.png
61 ms
l
43 ms
googlelogo_color_42x16dp.png
62 ms
stonewater.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
stonewater.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
stonewater.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stonewater.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Stonewater.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stonewater.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stonewater. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: