Tools & Wizards About Us
stonorsearch.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

stonorsearch.com

Marketing Recruitment Agency in Buckinghamshire - Welcome to Stonor Recruitment

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

239 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

129 ms

stonorsearch.com screenshot

About Website

Visit stonorsearch.com now to see the best up-to-date Stonor Search content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stonorsearch.com

Stonor Recruitment provides jobs to candidates for clients working in Marketing, Digital, Tech, Inbound Marketing, Content, Creative, Insight, Legal, PR & Partnerships

Visit stonorsearch.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stonorsearch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 239 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stonorsearch.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,550 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.4 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stonorsearch.com

239 ms

www.stonorsearch.com

1271 ms

css

75 ms

css

91 ms

css

103 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Stonorsearch.com, 21% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Stonorsearch.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 171.7 kB (20%)

Content Size

839.6 kB

After Optimization

667.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stonorsearch.com main page is 839.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 496.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 136.3 kB

  • Original 159.2 kB
  • After minification 122.2 kB
  • After compression 22.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 36.9 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 136.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 29 B

  • Original 25.4 kB
  • After minification 25.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stonor Search images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 16.4 kB

  • Original 496.5 kB
  • After minification 496.5 kB
  • After compression 480.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 19.0 kB

  • Original 158.5 kB
  • After minification 156.1 kB
  • After compression 139.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stonorsearch.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.0 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (79%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stonor Search. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

stonorsearch.com

stonorsearch.com

239 ms

www.stonorsearch.com

www.stonorsearch.com

1271 ms

css

css

75 ms

css

css

91 ms

css

css

103 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

77 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

87 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

71 ms

sky-forms.css

sky-forms.css

196 ms

style.css

style.css

301 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

230 ms

style-switcher.css

style-switcher.css

225 ms

custom-inner.css

custom-inner.css

304 ms

custom-responsive.css

custom-responsive.css

224 ms

custom-inner.css

custom-inner.css

244 ms

chosen.css

chosen.css

296 ms

client:platform.js

client:platform.js

76 ms

client:platform.js

client:platform.js

84 ms

js

js

145 ms

sharethis.js

sharethis.js

68 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

61 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

287 ms

jquery.masonry.min.js

jquery.masonry.min.js

290 ms

bootstrap-slider.css

bootstrap-slider.css

323 ms

bootstrap-slider.js

bootstrap-slider.js

482 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

57 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

64 ms

menu-slider.js

menu-slider.js

488 ms

api.js

api.js

85 ms

modalEffects.js

modalEffects.js

488 ms

ns-default.css

ns-default.css

481 ms

ns-style-attached.css

ns-style-attached.css

481 ms

classie.js

classie.js

480 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

545 ms

notificationFx.js

notificationFx.js

542 ms

translations_en.js

translations_en.js

550 ms

validate.js

validate.js

549 ms

jquery.validationEngine-en.js

jquery.validationEngine-en.js

549 ms

jquery.validationEngine.js

jquery.validationEngine.js

544 ms

63dd253a1e1b0359a712552c

63dd253a1e1b0359a712552c

150 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

18 ms

footer-acc-img.png

footer-acc-img.png

525 ms

358074778

358074778

521 ms

arrow-drop-right.png

arrow-drop-right.png

499 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

497 ms

sprites.svg

sprites.svg

492 ms

w-inner-reg-icon.svg

w-inner-reg-icon.svg

498 ms

w-popup-close-icon.svg

w-popup-close-icon.svg

490 ms

friends-icon.png

friends-icon.png

573 ms

js

js

73 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

54 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

68 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

166 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

341 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

356 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

361 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

360 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

708 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xk.ttf

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xk.ttf

361 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf

360 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xk.ttf

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xk.ttf

359 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf

401 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf

415 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf

415 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf

415 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf

416 ms

KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf

KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf

416 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

317 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

381 ms

collect

collect

274 ms

widget

widget

848 ms

inject-v3.min.js

inject-v3.min.js

314 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

156 ms

anchor

anchor

44 ms

anchor

anchor

203 ms

api.js

api.js

12 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

4 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

19 ms

81IjrRH91DAKpIx-VEJHPdpf7wiRaH8tg-uktu3LK4I.js

81IjrRH91DAKpIx-VEJHPdpf7wiRaH8tg-uktu3LK4I.js

95 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

97 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

77 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

25 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

5 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

4 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

6 ms

Accessibility Review

stonorsearch.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

stonorsearch.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

stonorsearch.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stonorsearch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stonorsearch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stonorsearch.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stonor Search. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: