Tools & Wizards About Us
storage.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

storage.net

storage.net — Storage, Data Storage, Data Recovery, Hard Drives, Backup and more…

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

213 ms

Resources Loaded

830 ms

Page Rendered

125 ms

storage.net screenshot

About Website

Visit storage.net now to see the best up-to-date Storage content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about storage.net

Storage practical solutions. Personal storage, network storage, computer storage, data storage, hard drives, and more…

Visit storage.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Storage.net page load time and found that the first response time was 213 ms and then it took 955 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

storage.net performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

57/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.1 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,550 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.storage.net

213 ms

style.css

30 ms

layout.css

48 ms

custom.css

49 ms

styles.css

229 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Storage.net, 11% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to Stats.wordpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (301 ms) belongs to the original domain Storage.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 24.1 kB (12%)

Content Size

199.9 kB

After Optimization

175.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Storage.net main page is 199.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 158.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 10.5 kB

  • Original 15.0 kB
  • After minification 14.6 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.5 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 20 B

  • Original 16.9 kB
  • After minification 16.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Storage images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

  • Original 158.4 kB
  • After minification 158.4 kB
  • After compression 148.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 9.6 kB
  • After minification 9.1 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Storage.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.0 kB or 42% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (65%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Storage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.storage.net

www.storage.net

213 ms

style.css

style.css

30 ms

layout.css

layout.css

48 ms

custom.css

custom.css

49 ms

styles.css

styles.css

229 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

82 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

48 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

71 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

301 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

300 ms

e-202410.js

e-202410.js

6 ms

e-202410.js

e-202410.js

27 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

103 ms

icon-rss.gif

icon-rss.gif

29 ms

network-storage-sm.jpg

network-storage-sm.jpg

29 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

17 ms

dot-ddd.gif

dot-ddd.gif

44 ms

collect

collect

32 ms

js

js

117 ms

Accessibility Review

storage.net accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

storage.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

storage.net SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Storage.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Storage.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

storage.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Storage. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: