Tools & Wizards About Us
storagemart.biz screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

storagemart.biz

Storage Mart - Self Storage and Mini Storage in Milwaukee WI

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

310 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

137 ms

storagemart.biz screenshot

About Website

Welcome to storagemart.biz homepage info - get ready to check Storage Mart best content right away, or after learning these important things about storagemart.biz

Storage Made Simple It's never been easier to clear the clutter from your home without giving away your cherished belongings. At StorageMart, we provide clean regular and climate-controlled self ...

Visit storagemart.biz

Key Findings

We analyzed Storagemart.biz page load time and found that the first response time was 310 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

storagemart.biz performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.312

37/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.6 s

69/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.storagemart.biz

310 ms

normalize.css

56 ms

style.css

109 ms

prettyPhoto.css

107 ms

flexslider.css

108 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Storagemart.biz, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (381 ms) belongs to the original domain Storagemart.biz.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 51.6 kB (11%)

Content Size

450.1 kB

After Optimization

398.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Storagemart.biz main page is 450.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 279.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 21.7 kB

  • Original 28.8 kB
  • After minification 27.3 kB
  • After compression 7.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.7 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

  • Original 279.2 kB
  • After minification 272.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Storage Mart images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 14.9 kB

  • Original 103.5 kB
  • After minification 103.5 kB
  • After compression 88.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 14.9 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 38.7 kB
  • After minification 38.7 kB
  • After compression 30.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Storagemart.biz needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.4 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (80%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Storage Mart. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.storagemart.biz

www.storagemart.biz

310 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

56 ms

style.css

style.css

109 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

107 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

108 ms

skeleton.css

skeleton.css

105 ms

touchTouch.css

touchTouch.css

104 ms

320.css

320.css

116 ms

480.css

480.css

158 ms

768.css

768.css

157 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

188 ms

styles.css

styles.css

193 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

213 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

195 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

209 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

208 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

232 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

237 ms

jquery.tools.min.js

jquery.tools.min.js

243 ms

jquery.mobilemenu.js

jquery.mobilemenu.js

262 ms

jquery.elastislide.js

jquery.elastislide.js

263 ms

jquery.loader.js

jquery.loader.js

267 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

268 ms

slides.jquery.js

slides.jquery.js

273 ms

jquery.twitter.js

jquery.twitter.js

277 ms

jquery.flickrush.js

jquery.flickrush.js

316 ms

touchTouch.jquery.js

touchTouch.jquery.js

316 ms

audio.js

audio.js

321 ms

custom.js

custom.js

320 ms

style.css

style.css

337 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

337 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

373 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

374 ms

index.js

index.js

379 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

379 ms

printomat.js

printomat.js

381 ms

print_elements.js

print_elements.js

380 ms

css

css

21 ms

css

css

40 ms

css

css

42 ms

css

css

44 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

247 ms

Storage-Logo-CMYK-e1369865693636.gif

Storage-Logo-CMYK-e1369865693636.gif

60 ms

marker.png

marker.png

106 ms

5084310-940x415.jpg

5084310-940x415.jpg

205 ms

5090116-940x415.jpg

5090116-940x415.jpg

204 ms

5084318-940x415.jpg

5084318-940x415.jpg

207 ms

Storage-Logo-CMYK-e1369865693636.gif

Storage-Logo-CMYK-e1369865693636.gif

112 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

149 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

16 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff

42 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

18 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

16 ms

pagination.png

pagination.png

57 ms

Accessibility Review

storagemart.biz accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

storagemart.biz best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

storagemart.biz SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Storagemart.biz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Storagemart.biz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

storagemart.biz

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Storage Mart. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: