26 sec in total
145 ms
13.8 sec
12 sec
Welcome to storagereview.com homepage info - get ready to check Storage Review best content for Mexico right away, or after learning these important things about storagereview.com
StorageReview.com is a world leading independent storage authority. While storage reviews is in the name, we look at the entire IT stack.
Visit storagereview.comWe analyzed Storagereview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 145 ms and then it took 25.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
storagereview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value11.5 s
0/100
25%
Value15.7 s
0/100
10%
Value14,810 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.039
99/100
15%
Value25.0 s
0/100
10%
145 ms
730 ms
534 ms
609 ms
508 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Storagereview.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Securepubads.g.doubleclick.net and 4% (3 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Storagereview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 414.5 kB (33%)
1.3 MB
844.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Storagereview.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 708.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Storage Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 214.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 214.4 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 116.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Storagereview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 116.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (47%)
62
33
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Storage Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
storagereview.com
145 ms
www.storagereview.com
730 ms
google_service.js
534 ms
aggregator.css
609 ms
node.css
508 ms
defaults.css
509 ms
system.css
508 ms
system-menus.css
492 ms
user.css
493 ms
content-module.css
491 ms
ckeditor.css
492 ms
ctools.css
492 ms
date.css
725 ms
datepicker.css
757 ms
jquery.timeentry.css
724 ms
filefield.css
756 ms
panels.css
723 ms
imgupload.css
714 ms
views.css
715 ms
style.css
715 ms
jquery.min.js
714 ms
drupal.js
714 ms
panels.js
649 ms
jquery.js
707 ms
plusone.js
649 ms
google_ads.js
390 ms
ga.js
314 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
2501 ms
source.png
1849 ms
logo_tab_top_nav_main_huawei.png
1847 ms
SR%20SSD.gif
1847 ms
wd_logo.png
1849 ms
drivesavers_logo1.png
1846 ms
storagereview%20vmworld2017%20small.gif
1846 ms
panZura-logo-color-final-2016.jpg
1848 ms
Dell%20Round%20Logo.jpg
1848 ms
StorageReview-Crucial-BX300-Thumb.jpg
1893 ms
StorageReview-USA-Nexenta-SuperMicro-Thumb.jpg
1847 ms
StorageReview-Fujitsu-ETERNUS-AF250-Thumb.jpg
1731 ms
StorageReview-Dell-S3148P-Thumb.jpg
2163 ms
StorageReview-WD-My-Passport-Ultra-Thumb(2).jpg
2162 ms
StorageReview-NetGear-4360x-Thumb.jpg
2163 ms
Editors%20Choice%20160%20Wide%20Sidebar.png
2162 ms
logo_testlab_0.png
2162 ms
SR%20Newsletter_0.png
3419 ms
icon-webinars.png
3202 ms
SR-SSD_0.jpg
3202 ms
all.js
3201 ms
__utm.gif
901 ms
ads
3051 ms
collect
2993 ms
2141 ms
941606062331986022
3062 ms
m_window_focus_non_hydra.js
2999 ms
osd.js
1972 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
2165 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
2815 ms
ads
440 ms
bg_boxshadow.png
1213 ms
ads
456 ms
ads
247 ms
1621236398896532431
733 ms
icon-facebook.png
704 ms
icon-twitter.png
571 ms
icon-youtube.png
571 ms
icon-rss.png
571 ms
ads
91 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
183 ms
storagereview.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
storagereview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
storagereview.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Storagereview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Storagereview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
storagereview.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Storage Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: