2.5 sec in total
310 ms
1.8 sec
377 ms
Click here to check amazing Storing content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about storing.com
Hassle-free self storage. Cheap storage units for London and surroundings. Move from current storage and save money – FREE collection.
Visit storing.comWe analyzed Storing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 310 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
storing.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
50/100
10%
Value3.8 s
55/100
25%
Value7.4 s
27/100
10%
Value1,730 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.181
67/100
15%
Value12.3 s
15/100
10%
310 ms
425 ms
75 ms
110 ms
50 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Storing.com, 9% (3 requests) were made to E4ror8f9om3.exactdn.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Storing.com.
Page size can be reduced by 114.1 kB (29%)
399.6 kB
285.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Storing.com main page is 399.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 206.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 114.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Storing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 15 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (82%)
28
5
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Storing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
storing.com
310 ms
storing.com
425 ms
gtm.js
75 ms
js
110 ms
tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js
50 ms
main_dd85f942.css
394 ms
jquery.min.js
52 ms
css2
57 ms
basic.min.css
419 ms
theme.min.css
420 ms
lazysizes.min.js
431 ms
rtafar.app.min.js
419 ms
scripts.min.js
431 ms
main_dd85f942.js
623 ms
common_dd85f942.js
652 ms
dom-ready.min.js
683 ms
hooks.min.js
645 ms
i18n.min.js
706 ms
a11y.min.js
722 ms
jquery.json.min.js
910 ms
gravityforms.min.js
990 ms
utils.min.js
1003 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
1030 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
984 ms
akismet___inc__akismet-frontend-js-vc2a061d596784f8648811684f33144ba8f8b5dae.js
1035 ms
fbevents.js
92 ms
storing-hero.jpg
259 ms
storing-hero-1024x476.jpg
279 ms
storing-hero.jpg
310 ms
jizaRExUiTo99u79P0U.ttf
90 ms
jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh4Ok.ttf
103 ms
asset_composer.js
49 ms
storing.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
storing.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
storing.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Storing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Storing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
storing.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Storing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: