Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

storyfox.ru

Сторифокс — лучшие истории со всего мира

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

111 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

83 ms

storyfox.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit storyfox.ru now to see the best up-to-date Storyfox content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about storyfox.ru

Обожаю собирать интересные истории со всего мира, смеюсь над забавными фактами, сопереживаю трогательным моментам жизни. Люблю делиться прекрасным со всеми своими друзьями!

Visit storyfox.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Storyfox.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 111 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

storyfox.ru performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

87/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.4 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,490 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.278

44/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

storyfox.ru

111 ms

storyfox.ru

501 ms

css

82 ms

style.min.css

24 ms

style.css

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Storyfox.ru, 17% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (769 ms) relates to the external source Widget.adplay.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 185.4 kB (42%)

Content Size

439.5 kB

After Optimization

254.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Storyfox.ru main page is 439.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 205.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 183.1 kB

  • Original 205.9 kB
  • After minification 199.9 kB
  • After compression 22.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 183.1 kB or 89% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 204.4 kB
  • After minification 204.4 kB
  • After compression 202.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 472 B

  • Original 29.2 kB
  • After minification 28.9 kB
  • After compression 28.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Storyfox.ru has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (69%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Storyfox. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

storyfox.ru accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

storyfox.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

storyfox.ru SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Storyfox.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Storyfox.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: