Access storytellersproject.com. Home - Storytellers Project

Report Summary

About Website

Visit storytellersproject.com now to see the best up-to-date Storytellers Project content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about storytellersproject.com

A nationwide series of true, first-person stories featuring everyday neighbors and notables, hosted by journalists from USA TODAY NETWORK newsrooms.

Visit storytellersproject.com

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value430 ms

65/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.5 s

24/100

10%

storytellersproject.com

29 ms

www.storytellersproject.com

41 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

35 ms

select2.min.css

34 ms

iconfonts.css

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Storytellersproject.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (190 ms) relates to the external source Maps.googleapis.com.

Content Size

939.3 kB

After Optimization

830.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Storytellersproject.com main page is 939.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 450.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 27.9 kB

Original 36.1 kB
After minification 34.3 kB
After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

Original 272.9 kB
After minification 271.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Storytellers Project images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 61.2 kB

Original 450.9 kB
After minification 450.9 kB
After compression 389.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 61.2 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 18.3 kB

Original 179.4 kB
After minification 179.2 kB
After compression 161.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Storytellersproject.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Storytellers Project. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Storytellersproject.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Storytellersproject.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

storytellersproject.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Storytellers Project. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Home - Storytellers Project | part of the USA TODAY NETWORK

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)