Tools & Wizards About Us
strathclydedrainage.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

strathclydedrainage.com

Strathclyde Drainage | Blocked Drains Glasgow, Scotland | Drainage Company

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

268 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

400 ms

strathclydedrainage.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to strathclydedrainage.com homepage info - get ready to check Strathclyde Drainage best content right away, or after learning these important things about strathclydedrainage.com

Strathclyde Drainage specialize in blocked drains and clearing of all major drain problems, these problems range from something as simple as…

Visit strathclydedrainage.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Strathclydedrainage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 268 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

strathclydedrainage.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

60/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.262

47/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

46/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

strathclydedrainage.com

268 ms

strathclydedrainage.com

452 ms

js

77 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

163 ms

font-awesome.min.css

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Strathclydedrainage.com, 11% (4 requests) were made to Kenwheeler.github.io and 6% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (764 ms) belongs to the original domain Strathclydedrainage.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 25.1 kB (30%)

Content Size

84.4 kB

After Optimization

59.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Strathclydedrainage.com main page is 84.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 31.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 22.0 kB

  • Original 25.8 kB
  • After minification 15.8 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.0 kB, which is 39% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 22.2 kB
  • After minification 22.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Strathclyde Drainage images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 587 B

  • Original 31.5 kB
  • After minification 31.4 kB
  • After compression 30.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 4.9 kB
  • After minification 4.5 kB
  • After compression 2.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Strathclydedrainage.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.5 kB or 50% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (34%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Strathclyde Drainage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

strathclydedrainage.com

strathclydedrainage.com

268 ms

strathclydedrainage.com

strathclydedrainage.com

452 ms

js

js

77 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

163 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

46 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

64 ms

style.css

style.css

327 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

331 ms

custom.css

custom.css

331 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

30 ms

slick.css

slick.css

32 ms

logo.png

logo.png

400 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

425 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

764 ms

9.jpg

9.jpg

649 ms

blocked.png

blocked.png

574 ms

drain.png

drain.png

574 ms

cctv.png

cctv.png

578 ms

plumb.png

plumb.png

584 ms

testing.png

testing.png

764 ms

call.png

call.png

763 ms

circle1.png

circle1.png

664 ms

circle2.png

circle2.png

667 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

25 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

22 ms

slick.js

slick.js

9 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

643 ms

phone.png

phone.png

675 ms

footer-logo.png

footer-logo.png

675 ms

img.jpg

img.jpg

629 ms

phone-bg.png

phone-bg.png

477 ms

after-shape.png

after-shape.png

480 ms

shape2.png

shape2.png

480 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

15 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

17 ms

Accessibility Review

strathclydedrainage.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

strathclydedrainage.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

strathclydedrainage.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Strathclydedrainage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Strathclydedrainage.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

strathclydedrainage.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Strathclyde Drainage. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: