5 sec in total
1.9 sec
2.6 sec
381 ms
Click here to check amazing Strhatetalk content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about strhatetalk.com
ทางเข้า UFABET สมัคร เว็บแทงบอลออนไลน์ ยูฟ่าเบท ที่ได้มาตรฐานระดับโลก เว็บ UFABET มือถือ ที่ดีที่สุดในประเทศไทย แทงบอลออนไลน์ คาสิโน บาคาร่า สล๊อต.
Visit strhatetalk.comWe analyzed Strhatetalk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
strhatetalk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
78/100
10%
Value3.2 s
72/100
25%
Value5.4 s
57/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.2 s
95/100
10%
1947 ms
72 ms
197 ms
207 ms
155 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Strhatetalk.com, 44% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Strhatetalk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 70.3 kB (42%)
166.5 kB
96.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Strhatetalk.com main page is 166.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 57.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 12% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Strhatetalk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.9 kB or 29% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (83%)
12
2
The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Strhatetalk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
strhatetalk.com
1947 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
72 ms
style.min.css
197 ms
style.css
207 ms
font-awesome.min.css
155 ms
css
19 ms
font-style5.css
153 ms
jquery.min.js
231 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
142 ms
html5.js
245 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
264 ms
menu-dropdown.js
264 ms
myscripts.js
388 ms
74-600x400.jpeg
294 ms
73-600x400.jpeg
295 ms
72-600x400.jpeg
294 ms
71.jpeg
294 ms
70-600x400.jpeg
294 ms
68-600x400.jpeg
294 ms
67-600x400.jpg
294 ms
66-600x360.jpeg
295 ms
65-600x400.webp
294 ms
64-600x400.jpeg
294 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWCWtFCc.woff
23 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWCWtFCfQ7A.woff
22 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw3q5d0.woff
22 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw3q5d0N7w.woff
8 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw3q5d0.woff
22 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHw3q5d0N7w.woff
21 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlE92JQEk.woff
22 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlE92JQEl8qw.woff
71 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z11lE92JQEl8qw.woff
124 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedHFHGPc.woff
69 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedHFHGPezSQ.woff
72 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJbedHFHGPezSQ.woff
73 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlE92JQEk.woff
71 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlE92JQEl8qw.woff
121 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z11lE92JQEl8qw.woff
123 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfrx9897g.woff
72 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_FQfrx9897sxZ.woff
120 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-sNiXg7Q.woff
72 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAUi-sNiXg7eU0.woff
120 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
236 ms
strhatetalk.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
strhatetalk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
strhatetalk.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Strhatetalk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Strhatetalk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
strhatetalk.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: