Tools & Wizards About Us
stricoff.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

stricoff.com

Stricoff Fine Art Gallery, Chelsea NY, Paintings sculpture

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

473 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

156 ms

stricoff.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to stricoff.com homepage info - get ready to check Stricoff best content right away, or after learning these important things about stricoff.com

Stricoff Fine Art Gallery: Catherine Mackey, Paul Beliveau, Rimi Yang, David Kessler, Emma Rodgers, Micheal Madigan, Jeff Cohen, Max Steven Grossman

Visit stricoff.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stricoff.com page load time and found that the first response time was 473 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stricoff.com performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

78/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

49/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.8 s

90/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stricoff.com

473 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

19 ms

style.min.css

38 ms

page-list.css

55 ms

css

43 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Stricoff.com, 14% (2 requests) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net and 7% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (473 ms) belongs to the original domain Stricoff.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 19.8 kB (8%)

Content Size

240.8 kB

After Optimization

221.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stricoff.com main page is 240.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 174.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 16.6 kB

  • Original 22.0 kB
  • After minification 21.3 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 66 B

  • Original 174.1 kB
  • After minification 174.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stricoff images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 203 B

  • Original 22.5 kB
  • After minification 22.5 kB
  • After compression 22.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 22.1 kB
  • After minification 22.1 kB
  • After compression 19.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stricoff.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.9 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (46%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stricoff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

stricoff.com

stricoff.com

473 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

19 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

38 ms

page-list.css

page-list.css

55 ms

css

css

43 ms

style.css

style.css

55 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

73 ms

app.js

app.js

155 ms

logo.png

logo.png

24 ms

P1140047_stitch.jpg

P1140047_stitch.jpg

124 ms

instagram2-e1488393655212.jpeg

instagram2-e1488393655212.jpeg

29 ms

face-e1488392545725.png

face-e1488392545725.png

28 ms

dc.js

dc.js

32 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

16 ms

Accessibility Review

stricoff.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

stricoff.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

stricoff.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stricoff.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stricoff.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stricoff.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stricoff. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: