6.3 sec in total
273 ms
5.1 sec
930 ms
Click here to check amazing Stromkosten Vergleich content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stromkosten-vergleich.net
Warning: "continue" targeting switch is equivalent to "break". Did you mean to use "continue 2"? in /homepages/22/d230271916/htdocs/stromkostenv...
Visit stromkosten-vergleich.netWe analyzed Stromkosten-vergleich.net page load time and found that the first response time was 273 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
stromkosten-vergleich.net performance score
273 ms
456 ms
191 ms
17 ms
112 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Stromkosten-vergleich.net, 14% (5 requests) were made to Cdn2-vergleich.check24.de and 8% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Cdn1-vergleich.check24.de.
Page size can be reduced by 355.3 kB (64%)
554.8 kB
199.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Stromkosten-vergleich.net main page is 554.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 438.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stromkosten Vergleich images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 296.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 296.2 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stromkosten-vergleich.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (58%)
33
14
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stromkosten Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
stromkosten-vergleich.net
273 ms
www.stromkosten-vergleich.net
456 ms
style.css
191 ms
ga.js
17 ms
header-bg.jpg
112 ms
header.jpg
111 ms
logo.jpg
196 ms
menu-bg.jpg
201 ms
menu-head.jpg
199 ms
menu-li-bg.jpg
232 ms
menu-arrow.gif
219 ms
menu-foot.jpg
219 ms
content-bg.jpg
295 ms
content-head.jpg
297 ms
content-foot.jpg
301 ms
menu-r-bg.jpg
316 ms
menu-r-head.jpg
316 ms
menu-r-foot.jpg
339 ms
__utm.gif
10 ms
__utm.gif
4 ms
vergleich.html
586 ms
vergleich.html
581 ms
764 ms
check24-bluegrey.v24737749.css
845 ms
combined.v4153318851.minified.js
1033 ms
jquery.fancybox-2.1.5.pack.v1669444732.minified.js
1252 ms
jquery.fancybox-2.1.5.v3001789220.minified.css
675 ms
tuevsmall.gif
753 ms
sprite-human.png
158 ms
tracking_gif.php
152 ms
info.gif
659 ms
help.png
582 ms
ajax_button_submitting.gif
584 ms
ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png
625 ms
ui-bg_highlight-soft_75_cccccc_1x100.png
413 ms
ui-bg_glass_75_e6e6e6_1x400.png
418 ms
stromkosten-vergleich.net SEO score
DE
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stromkosten-vergleich.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Stromkosten-vergleich.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
stromkosten-vergleich.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stromkosten Vergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: