3.3 sec in total
357 ms
2.7 sec
186 ms
Visit stromvergleich.ws now to see the best up-to-date Stromvergleich content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stromvergleich.ws
Stromvergleich: Kostenlos Strompreise vergleichen und Online Stromanbieter wechseln. Mit unserem Billig-Strom-Vergleich finden Sie die günstigsten Stromanbieter.
Visit stromvergleich.wsWe analyzed Stromvergleich.ws page load time and found that the first response time was 357 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
stromvergleich.ws performance score
357 ms
583 ms
58 ms
188 ms
282 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Stromvergleich.ws, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (872 ms) belongs to the original domain Stromvergleich.ws.
Page size can be reduced by 874.7 kB (49%)
1.8 MB
901.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Stromvergleich.ws main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 679.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.2 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stromvergleich images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 486.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 486.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 361.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stromvergleich.ws needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 361.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (86%)
51
7
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stromvergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stromvergleich.ws
357 ms
www.stromvergleich.ws
583 ms
js
58 ms
bootstrap.min.css
188 ms
font-awesome.min.css
282 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
294 ms
global-style.css
392 ms
owl.carousel.css
297 ms
owl.theme.css
305 ms
sky-forms.css
302 ms
jquery.js
470 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
575 ms
modernizr.custom.js
409 ms
bootstrap.min.js
410 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js
411 ms
jquery.easing.js
493 ms
jquery.metadata.js
490 ms
jquery.hoverup.js
513 ms
jquery.hoverdir.js
513 ms
jquery.stellar.js
565 ms
jquery.dlmenu.js
588 ms
jquery.dlmenu.autofill.js
591 ms
jquery.powerful-placeholder.min.js
619 ms
cusel.min.js
619 ms
jquery.form.min.js
661 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
671 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
683 ms
jquery.modal.js
688 ms
bootstrap-hover-dropdown.min.js
726 ms
jquery.ui.totop.min.js
727 ms
jquery.mixitup.js
759 ms
jquery.mixitup.init.js
769 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
778 ms
waypoints.min.js
786 ms
jquery.countTo.js
827 ms
jquery.easypiechart.js
827 ms
rrssb.min.js
855 ms
jquery.nouislider.min.js
868 ms
owl.carousel.js
872 ms
analytics.js
23 ms
collect
13 ms
tooltip.js
699 ms
popover.js
654 ms
wp.app.js
642 ms
css
22 ms
css
39 ms
animate.css
569 ms
rrssb.css
582 ms
easypiechart.css
583 ms
stromvergleich-logo.png
203 ms
full-bg-20.jpg
758 ms
stromvergleich.jpg
154 ms
stromrechner.jpg
154 ms
jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKA.ttf
18 ms
jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf
27 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
28 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
28 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
28 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
191 ms
stromvergleich.ws SEO score
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stromvergleich.ws can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stromvergleich.ws main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stromvergleich.ws
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stromvergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: