Tools & Wizards About Us
stromvergleiche.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

stromvergleiche.de

Strom billiger dank Strompreisvergleich. Stromanbieter wechseln und günstige Stromanbieter wählen - stromvergleiche.de

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

424 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

118 ms

stromvergleiche.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Strom Vergleiche content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stromvergleiche.de

Strompreise der Stromanbieter im Vergleich - Ob Ökostrom oder billig Strom - nutzen Sie den Stromvergleich von stromvergleiche.de

Visit stromvergleiche.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Stromvergleiche.de page load time and found that the first response time was 424 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stromvergleiche.de performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

60/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value630 ms

47/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.6 s

47/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stromvergleiche.de

424 ms

www.stromvergleiche.de

665 ms

js

82 ms

styles.css

119 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 31% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Stromvergleiche.de, 13% (6 requests) were made to Ads.cheabit.com and 13% (6 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (665 ms) belongs to the original domain Stromvergleiche.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 36.0 kB (7%)

Content Size

539.6 kB

After Optimization

503.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stromvergleiche.de main page is 539.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 419.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 27.8 kB

  • Original 36.5 kB
  • After minification 35.2 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 271 B

  • Original 75.5 kB
  • After minification 75.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Strom Vergleiche images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 419.6 kB
  • After minification 419.5 kB
  • After compression 418.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 6.8 kB

  • Original 8.0 kB
  • After minification 4.6 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stromvergleiche.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (60%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Strom Vergleiche. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

stromvergleiche.de

stromvergleiche.de

424 ms

www.stromvergleiche.de

www.stromvergleiche.de

665 ms

js

js

82 ms

styles.css

styles.css

119 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

cookieconsent.min.css

38 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

cookieconsent.min.js

56 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

182 ms

amp-ad-0.1.js

amp-ad-0.1.js

35 ms

ajs.php

ajs.php

573 ms

stromvergleiche-logo.jpg

stromvergleiche-logo.jpg

127 ms

rechner_klein.jpg

rechner_klein.jpg

227 ms

eco.png

eco.png

336 ms

oekostrom2_klein.jpg

oekostrom2_klein.jpg

447 ms

sogehts_klein.jpg

sogehts_klein.jpg

340 ms

news_klein.jpg

news_klein.jpg

447 ms

neu.png

neu.png

339 ms

label1.gif

label1.gif

342 ms

label2.jpg

label2.jpg

447 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

398 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

36 ms

ads

ads

444 ms

ads

ads

484 ms

button.png

button.png

117 ms

doppelpfeil.gif

doppelpfeil.gif

114 ms

lg.php

lg.php

123 ms

ajs.php

ajs.php

230 ms

lg.php

lg.php

122 ms

ajs.php

ajs.php

259 ms

reactive_library.js

reactive_library.js

137 ms

ads

ads

354 ms

lg.php

lg.php

131 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

17 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

load_preloaded_resource.js

load_preloaded_resource.js

46 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

43 ms

s

s

11 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

63 ms

qs_click_protection.js

qs_click_protection.js

76 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

41 ms

5f7468413707c3abfd197d65a482477f.js

5f7468413707c3abfd197d65a482477f.js

208 ms

fullscreen_api_adapter.js

fullscreen_api_adapter.js

57 ms

interstitial_ad_frame.js

interstitial_ad_frame.js

64 ms

icon.png

icon.png

26 ms

feedback_grey600_24dp.png

feedback_grey600_24dp.png

197 ms

settings_grey600_24dp.png

settings_grey600_24dp.png

199 ms

Accessibility Review

stromvergleiche.de accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

stromvergleiche.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

stromvergleiche.de SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stromvergleiche.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stromvergleiche.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stromvergleiche.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Strom Vergleiche. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: