5.6 sec in total
428 ms
4.8 sec
379 ms
Click here to check amazing Sts content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sts.gb.net
Simple Technical Solutions are an industry-leading company that manufactures, and precision cleans parts for semiconductors.
Visit sts.gb.netWe analyzed Sts.gb.net page load time and found that the first response time was 428 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
sts.gb.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
7/100
10%
Value14.5 s
0/100
25%
Value10.7 s
7/100
10%
Value370 ms
70/100
30%
Value0.064
97/100
15%
Value13.2 s
12/100
10%
428 ms
33 ms
90 ms
172 ms
255 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Sts.gb.net, 18% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Sts.gb.net.
Page size can be reduced by 4.6 MB (87%)
5.3 MB
677.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Sts.gb.net main page is 5.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.5 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sts needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.5 MB or 92% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 12.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 12.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sts.gb.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (53%)
51
24
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sts. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sts.gb.net
428 ms
webfont.js
33 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
90 ms
codepeople_shearch_in_place.css
172 ms
style.min.css
255 ms
sds-table-style.css
257 ms
settings.css
246 ms
style.css
327 ms
js_composer.min.css
416 ms
shortcodes.css
263 ms
responsive.css
332 ms
jquery.js
446 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
344 ms
codepeople_shearch_in_place.js
348 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
492 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
413 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
456 ms
waypoints.min.js
456 ms
waypoints-sticky.min.js
523 ms
prettyPhoto.js
525 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
524 ms
functions.js
587 ms
flexslider.min.js
524 ms
smoothscroll.js
573 ms
comment-reply.min.js
573 ms
wp-embed.min.js
580 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
582 ms
css
53 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
16 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
19 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
23 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
25 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
26 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexQ.ttf
26 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf
25 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf
26 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf
26 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWVAexQ.ttf
27 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
28 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
29 ms
bg-pattern.png
1360 ms
STS-generic-logo-150.png
139 ms
banner11.png
446 ms
banner10.png
994 ms
banner9.png
376 ms
banner8.png
460 ms
banner7.png
454 ms
banner4.png
458 ms
banner3.png
530 ms
banner2.png
612 ms
banner1.png
544 ms
banner.png
620 ms
NMI-STS2B.jpg
610 ms
High-Res-STS-Logo-600x400.jpg
625 ms
Willstatt-600x400.jpg
692 ms
ico120.png
693 ms
NovellusLogo11.jpg
699 ms
gallery_chamber13-218x300.jpg
704 ms
iso-9001-logo-300x137.jpg
771 ms
2021_ISO9001_White_UKAS_SystemCert_COLOUR-scaled.jpg
778 ms
equipment-small.png
779 ms
equipment1.png
785 ms
analytics.js
17 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
831 ms
collect
12 ms
js
125 ms
icomoon.ttf
733 ms
sts.gb.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sts.gb.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
sts.gb.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sts.gb.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sts.gb.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sts.gb.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sts. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: